| German educator Friedirch said a word: And that the fate of the country was in thehands of the authorities, rather than in the hands of the hands of his mother". Thus it can beseen in the family education plays an important impact on the shape of a person. In academiccircles, research on family education very early began, parenting style also is not a newconcept, a person, no matter how personality acquired open flowers, flowers, roots in hisfamily, family education way is reasonable, correct, whether can help the healthy growth ofchildren, not only for the individual significance, but also affect the development andprosperity of a society.At the same time, nearly two years, Ma Jiajue people appear, make the universitystudent’s social intercourse again into the line of sight of people, the current situation is, socialinteraction problems of college students is not only exist, and even can be said to be a serious,if such a situation does not improve, not only to the development of college students, will alsoface leave no successor of the socialist cause dilemma.Research shows that, social interaction problems of college students, from the root, andvalues, the way of family education, which is the theoretical basis of this study. But howmuch, how about, which is trying to solve the research question.In addition, the students in top-up program the environment and their own situation andgeneral college students have difference, to rise only this group is huge, but the domesticstudy on the students of the less, there is no research on college students family educationrelations and social intercourse the, in order to fill in this gap, in order to better family andsocial, taking students in top-up program as the research object, trying to understand thestudents parenting styles and social avoidance in distress situation rise, as well as therelationship between them. Finally, this study come to the following conclusions:1:Students in top-up program’ family upbringing and compared various factors andnorm have certain differences.Compared with the norm YueDongMei, parenting style in father’ emotional warmthunderstand (FFl), mother’ emotional warmth and understanding (MFl) factor scores arerelatively higher than the norm, too much interference (FF3), severe and punishing (FF2),father’ refused and deny (FF5), father’ overprotection (FF6), mother’ refused and deny (MF3),mother’ severe and punishment(MF4) factors scores on relative is lower than the norm, andthe father’ preferred subjects (FF4), overly interference and protection (MF2) and mother’preference subjects (MF5) the three factor scores were significantly lower than norm.2: Students in top-up program’ upbringing and social avoidance pain there is significantdifference on the gender dimension.Father of boys tend to take too much interference, such as breeding, preference andcomparison of the performance, the mother would not have such a significantdifference.Overall girls social avoidance and distress not satisfaction is higher than boys.onchildren’s gender dimensions have significant differences.3:Students in top-up program have significant difference exists among students’ socialavoidance and distress.Students in top-up program exist significant differences in terms of social avoidance anddistress (t=4.03, p <0.01) and social avoidance score is lower than the social distress.4: Social avoidance and distress dimensions exist significant differences ingrade.Sophomore top-up program ’ social avoidance score of more than freshman in top-upprogram, social distress scores below grade rise only this one, in general, freshman in top-upprogram ’ social avoidance pain score is lower than sophomore in top-up program. 5: Parenting style correlation between social avoidance and distress.Originally to theexperience of college students’ social avoidance and distress with parents’ emotional warmth,understanding, has negative correlation with parents refused to deny that, excessive protection.Too much interference has significant positive correlation. |
PDF Full Text Request