Comparative Study On Sports Thinking Level Of Different Levels Of Basketball Players

In this study, through the analysis of basketball and basketball expert novice oral report,compare their difference shooting simulation problem representation in the context of furtherstudy, the difference in their exercise of thinking. This study distinguishes the expert andnovice basketball movement thinking on the nature of the help of movement of thinking, isconducive to the teaching and training of basketball, help the novice players to a higher levelof basketball athletes study, help them faster maturity.In this study, the literature in writing papers were in CNKI, HeBei library, Shijiazhuangcity library, HeBei University Library and the Internet to collect the required documents.Including Chinese literature and foreign literature. This study uses expert-Novicecomparison method is a common method to research motion of expertise. Studies suggest thathigh level athletes are good because they have a psychological advantage. In this study, usingthe method of expert and novice differences in basketball sport thinking of basketball,basketball experts to explain the reasons why good. In order to determine the situation andproblem to be used in this study to simulate shooting, scoring and supplementary simulationscenarios and I visited expert10basketball teaching and training field and questionnaire toexperts to me to use, confirm the research institute to the shooting scene simulation andproblems. Oral report method employed in this study is to make athletes to advance designgood shooting oral report simulation problems, and then use the oral record measurementmodel of oral report method to get information for analysis of quantization and coding. Thisstudy through the use of social statistics software SPSS18.0to carry on the statistical analysisof the encoded oral report, mainly uses the independent sample t test method for meancomparison. The difference between the statistical software only comparative data, and thesedifferences, reflecting the problems need logic methods to analyze. On the difference ofbasketball players and basketball athletes expert novice between concepts I starts from thedynamic control system of movement of thinking of. Dynamic regulation system ofmovement of thinking is the athletes after selective perception and attention to the externalenvironment formed the task information that need to solve the problem with their long-termmemory system in the movement of knowledge and experience to solve the problem of thinking process. So the concept difference of the athlete oral report, such as the targetconcept, the concept of condition, the concept of action reflects the characteristics of theathletes selective perception and attention, connection efficiency sports experience andknowledge reserves and task information and memory information. In addition, I also makedifference to the athletes thinking features from motion thinking analysis. Generally, exercisethinking includes operating thinking, tactical thinking and immediate thinking. Because theoperating thinking test is generally use three chip test, to reflect on the time and number ofsteps, so it is not the content analysis. While the immediate thinking is the movement ofintuition, because the study ability is limited, so don’t as content analysis.The study, basketball expert and novice in the total target concept, the concept,significant differences were existed condition concept and action of the concept. The numberof basketball experts are more than basketball new concept. In the comparison of the threelevel of basketball in the target concept, expert and novice have significant differences,basketball experts are more than basketball novice. In comparison with three levels and twotypes of the concept of basketball experts, except for a fuzzy condition of other conditions andtypes are and novice have significant differences, and basketball experts than novice. In thecomparison of the three level of action concept and three types of basketball experts, inaddition to other significant number of levels and types of fuzzy action on the level of conceptof operations on the novice and the differences were more than. Comparison between the fourconcepts of expert novice, basketball is more conceptual relationship and there is a significantdifference. Comparison of complexity in the problem representation in the complexity ofcharacterization, basketball expert problem is much higher than that of the novice. Thenumber of women’s basketball athletes in the concept of expert regardless of the total targetconcept, concept, the concept of the concept of action conditions, are significantly differentthan men and. Contact in concept, basketball expert athletes in men only in the contact actioncondition and women concept, the other three concepts are not as good as the woman contact.The complexity in the representation of women’s basketball players, experts are morecomplex than the men’s basketball players in the oral report of expert representation problemin. Novice players in basketball than men in the number of concepts are many and obviousdifferences. The relationship between number of concept, women’s novice basketball players in-action between concepts than men and more obvious differences. The complexity in theproblem representation, women’s novice basketball player than men basketball athleterepresentation of the problem more complex. Through the analysis of the40basketballplayers in the oral report, I found that the women’s basketball expert athletes thinking abilityis the most outstanding. Dynamic regulation of sports thinking requests the athlete to havekeen observation and attention, also must have the rich knowledge and experience of sportsreserve, and can quickly mobilize the knowledge and experience to solve the match problem.The athlete tactic ability also depends on the. Basketball experts is strong because ofregulatory system thinking they have stronger. Only in the regulation of motion of the systemunder the action of thinking more, athletes can be more flexible use of tactics, consider thetactical problems more deep, more not easily influenced by the changing competitionenvironment, also is to use the strategy of player better to defeat the enemy.