The Process Evaluation On The Researching Project Management Inpetrochemical Enterprises

With the continuous progress of social development and social needs of the market, thenumber of research projects continue to increase in the twenty-first century is the era ofproject management. New direction of the management theory, project management, projectplanning, execution control has become a project organization, and implementation ofpowerful form. Modern scientific research project management has formed a system ofmanagement theory and management practices play a huge role in practical applications. Inorder to achieve the sustainable development of the North China Branch of Sinopec, thecompany will further increase the scientific and technological research, and continuouslyimprove the scientific management system. Seize the efficient development of oil and gasfields, faster production, strong and stable yield the main issues and improve the researchcapability of independent innovation, deepen the technology of geological exploration of oiland gas fields, strengthen the construction of oil and gas fields ground to improve oil and gasmining and transportation technology level, accelerate the conversion efficiency of scientificresearch to solve Ordosultra-low permeability oil and gas fields of the basin resources areeffectively utilized the problems of the world.With other projects, research projects applicable to the life cycle theory, scientificresearch projects, the implementation of concluding the process is a complete life cycle.However, compared with other projects, scientific research and evaluation work is difficult,this is because the data collection difficulties, research performance is not obvious, processcontrol difficulties and other characteristics in research projects. Comprehensive analysis ofdomestic and international science and technology project evaluation theory, methods,research literature, Sinopec North China Branch of scientific research project managementstatus and problems of analysis to determine the general idea of the scientific researchprocess evaluation and assessment principles.This study established the scientific research process evaluation index system andmethods aimed at the implementation of research projects conducted scientific research scientific research project management based on judgment, decision makers in researchprojects. Research methods used in this study will be a combination of qualitative andquantitative. Delphi method and Analytic Hierarchy Process integrated approach to buildingevaluation index system and methods of scientific research process. Through empiricalanalysis shows that with a strong practical. One advantage of the method evaluation results ofscience, for the process management of research projects to provide a reliable basis fordecision making; The second is the company Commitment to research the classification andevaluation, the evaluation results are more accurate, more scientific and project management;Third, the is the the various types of in the the the evaluation index system of, Indicators DataSources at all levels and opening up; Fourth, the evaluation method is simple and clear, easyto master. Evaluation by a professional research project management department, also beused for research projects self-test self-assessment; Fifth, the evaluation method is applicableto the various stages of the research project implementation process, and can be generalizedto other stages to research projects.