| Objective: To observe the curative effect of filiform needle blade needle combined with clinical cases treatment of periarthritis of shoulder, clinical curative effect contrast filiform needle in the treatment of this disease, the comparison and the analysis of the two treatment, thus confirming edged needle for treatment of the disease with the advantage of acupuncture needle.Methods:We have 60 randomized patients with periarthritis of shoulder to two groups. The treatment group(acupuncture combined with knife needle) in 30 cases, the control group(acupuncture) of 30 cases.Treatment group: looking for the pain or abnormal reaction in around shoulder joint. The needle edge is carried on the longitudinal release of the abnormal reaction points as detected by the tendon and muscle direction, needling depth depends on the specific circumstances.Be active or passive movement of patients after treatment. Acupuncture needle Yu take ipsilateral shoulder, shoulder Liao with Xiefa.Bilateral Yanglingquan, Taibai adopting reinforcing method.According to the location of the pain, tenderness point position is different, the dialectical belongs to a via or a few by. Ipsilateral lesions meridian acupoints were selected, using the fill method.Control group: needle taken ipsilateral Ji, Ji with the reducing method. Bilateral Yanglingquan, Taibai adopting reinforcing method. According to the location of the pain, tenderness point position is different, the dialectical belongs to a via or a few by. Ipsilateral lesions were selected acupoints of main and collateral channels, using the fill method. The treatment group knife needle treatment once every three days, acupuncture once a day.The control proup acupuncture once a day.On the 10 day for 1 courses. After the 2 course of treatment, the curative effect was evaluated and statistical data.Results: 1. knife needle combined with filiform needle group treatment of scapulohumeral periarthritis better effect than filiform needle therapy group. 2.the total effective rate of treatment group was100%, control group, the total efficiency is 93.3%. Two met hods of treat ment, cli nical efficacy i n t he trea tment of all ar ound t he shoulder art hritis, but t he efficacy of t he treat ment group was more obvi ous t han t hat of t he control gr oup. |