Analysis Of Variance Among Provinces In Implementation Of Minimum Livelihood Guarantee

With the development of our society, the minimum living guarantee comes from the establishment phase into the stage of continuous development and improvement. We need to seriously sum experience, more than30years, which Dibao institute has gotten through in order to lay the foundation for the form of minimum living guarantee regime. The key problem of Dibao policy is the level of Dibao. It relates to whether the needs of Dibao recipients can be met, and the legality of the ruling party, but also the burden on taxpayers. Because the short history of Dibao, existed research focuses on the prominent problems encountered in practice of Dibao policy。Most fruit of the research explore how to formulate the Dibao standard. Why theorists have called for consideration of the local economy development when we determine the level of Dibao standard, but it still extremely low? This phenomenon means that we can not just stay in the study of how to develop the minimum standard, but more profoundly understand the factors affecting the local Dibao level.As the social policies that central government introduced a policy framework and fiscal subsidies and local government in charge of the specific implementation, the impact of local economic and social conditions of the Dibao should be the greatest.This study attempts to explain the differences in the level of Dibao from the place where the economic, political, social three levels. This study used2012data from the official website and national investigation conducted by research group on July and August2013. Then, simple correlation analysis, one of quantitative research methods, was used to investigate the correlation between core indicators of local economy and society and nominal Dibao level and the real Dibao level. Correlation between differences of nominal Dibao level and main indicators of local economy and society reveals the direction of the correlation between the Dibao standard and Dibao per capita expenditure and the key indicators of the local economy and society is reversed with the direction of the correlation between total expenditure and the number of people in Dibao and the key indicators of local economy and society. Correlation analysis in internal indicators of Dibao uncovers negative correlation between Dibao standards、Dibao per capita expenditure and Dibao total expenditure and the number of Dibao recipients. That is to say the higher the Dibao standard and Dibao per capita expenditure is, the less the Dibao total expenditure and the number of Dibao recipients is. The degree of Dibao level can not be evaluated consistently and the result of correlation between indicators of local economy and society and nominal Dibao level can not be explain properly. Discovery that the directions of correlation between four indicators of real Dibao level and local core indicators of economy and society are accordant are made by the Correlation analysis between real level of Dibao and key indicators of local economy and society. But the results were contrary to our hypothesis. This research concludes that the variance of the local real Dibao level were influenced by the subsidies of central government and the minority’policy according to the correlation analysis among internal indicators of Dibao level and the level of local economy development subsistence level of internal indicators and their correlation with the level of local economic development.