Reconstruction Of Judicial Credibility In Micro-blog Environment

Micro-blog has convenient, real-time, grassroots characteristics, more and morepeople attract public attention using these features to protect their interests, so a lot ofnegative comments about judiciary spill over to the micro-blog, leading to judicialcredibility facing serious challenges. Then judiciary launch micro-blog to respond thechallenges, but judiciary lack of the awareness of communication and the majority ofmicro-blog cannot deal with situation, so that the judiciary in the era of micro-blogsuffered unprecedented public trial, the credibility of the judiciary is facing greaterchallenges. Under this background, we analysis the number of negative comments aboutjudiciary, the demands of public and propagation characteristics by the empirical approach.The falling of judicial credibility mainly due to the judiciary’s own subjective factorsunder the micro-blog environment. The positive/negative factors of judiciary and thecredibility of the judicial are positive correlation. With the theory of state andcivil society, the essence of judicial credibility is the evaluation of the public on thejudicial work of the state, The fundamental reason for decline of judicial credibility isunable to construct a kind of benign relationship between state and society. The model of"weak state-strong society" is the right choice. With the communicative action theory ofHabermas, the effective communication between state and society is crucial to enhance thecredibility of the judiciary. First, we should construct the consciousness of rationalcommunication; second, we should construct the ideal communication situation throughthe micro-blog from the macro-view; finally,we should ensure the realization of the idealcommunication situation with concrete measures.