| With we comprehensively promote the rule of law, it is necessary for us to draw lessons from history, from the history of law in accordance with the constitution of the key found in the late Qing Dynasty," the outline of constitution made by the imperial order " and the " Magna Carta" is the first constitution of the two countries, this article attempts from the two countries of the first constitutional document comparison research in accordance with the law and the rule of law ruling that the constitution of the model, a difference of700years, the era background and text content are different, but the meaning of the Constitution on the imprint of the times, but also have many similar places, from which can be seen from the two different factors in different historical fate, we analysis from the comparison of the two fragments of history to may be able to find a real way of managing state affairs according to law.This paper makes a comparative study from several aspects, the first part is an overview of "imperial constitution outline" of the social background and the main content, the hundred years ago this literature background, the current situation, the main content, the main content, respectively, to limit the imperial power and the subjects of rights and obligations to classify two title. The second part introduces the "Magna Carta" social background, main contents, and the text includes four spirits of the law:the king under law, contract administration, guarantee of human rights, democratic council. The text is a contract, no obvious section, so the text string with the four spirit of the law. The third part tobe compared, comparison the similarities and differences of the content, then analyses the reasons from the aspects of the different fate of traditional culture, social structure. With analysis of the causes of the different fates, we understand the profound truth hidden in the text behind. |