Font Size: a A A

The Investigation Report Of Improving The Index System Of Justice In Shanxi Province

Posted on:2016-01-21Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:F LiFull Text:PDF
GTID:2296330482950942Subject:Law
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Scientific management is necessarily inherent requirements of all social activities, judicial activities is no exception. Cases quality assessment is based on the correct understanding and grasp of the law of the trial, the trial conduct and process control, evaluation, and guide an important mechanism of justice. In the late 1990s, some courts have pioneered the field of process management in the trial were positive and useful exploration, opening the course of the trial court management reform. "People’s Court Reform Program for five years," promulgated by the Supreme Court in 1999, for the first time explicitly put forward the reform of the management tasks related to the trial, and the trial of the core content of the quality of case management is to do the assessment.After trial management reform accompanied by a people’s court-depth reform of the judicial system and working mechanism and continuously push forward. Currently, Shanxi Province Higher People’s Court formulated the "Shanxi Province, the trial court to assess the quality assessment index system", a total of 23 indicators, which are indicators of nine justice, judicial efficiency targets 7, judicial performance metrics seven three parts. The current case, although the quality of the assessment made important achievements, but still faces many new situations and new problems, which the good quality assessment of cases put forward higher requirements, in order to make the case to assess the quality of the internal management is becoming a people’s court unlike both cases the trial, but also different judicial personnel management, a judicial government management of important judicial management activities, trial management core position in the people’s court management system will continue to be strengthened.2013, I launched the empirical research mentor for one year, but the results of this paper is part of Shanxi case assessment index system of quality assessment index system of justice that is theoretically deepening indicators to improve justice system to make it more Shanxi Province, in line with current judicial practice, trial courts in the province to create a new situation of scientific development.The full text is divided into an introduction, body and conclusion of three parts, the contents of which body parts included are:The first part describes the empirical analysis of the situation in Shanxi fair trial index system design and implementation, specifically broken down into Shanxi index system design fair trial and a fair trial Empirical Analysis of the Index System in Shanxi analysis of the effect of two aspects, in order to achieve a fair trial indicators comprehensive understanding.The second part describes the implementation of a fair trial in the index system problems through interpretation of field research data and analysis of field interviews, to master the problem of fair trial indicators exist, including fair trial index system design is unreasonable, indicators fair trial run first instance cases are not standardized and three jury index of alienation.The third part is the basic countermeasures on perfecting the index system of fair trial, a fair trial in Shanxi Province scientific construct the index system, improve the index design; effectively address violations of a fair trial in Shanxi index operation, and return to normal trajectory; efforts to overcome the first instance cases Jury index of alienation, remove the index, if necessary.
Keywords/Search Tags:the case quality evaluation, indicators of trial, improve the countermeasures
PDF Full Text Request
Related items