Geopolitical View Of China’s Policy Upon The North Korean Nuclear Threat

In the 1990 of the 20th century, the DPRK nuclear issue surfaced, intermittent explosive situation on the North’s nuclear crisis touches the nerve of the neighboring countries, and to some extent about the situation on the Korean peninsula and Northeast Asia’s security environment. In recent years, North Korea’s nuclear capability to elevate and frequent nuclear tests caused widespread international concern and fears. Unique geographical location, ethnic divisions, major powers intertwined in this strategic interest and intense game, preventing regional nuclear arms race and the urgency of establishing a peace mechanism, make the North Korean nuclear issue has become more complex, long-term and repeated, called the international transaction in the most difficult and most complex, one of the most volatile hot and difficult problems. The DPRK nuclear issue trace it to its source, is divided for a long time on the Korean peninsula after World War II, only normalizing DPRK-US and North Korea-South Korea relations, to a peace agreement replacing the Annistice Agreement in order to fundamentally resolve the North Korean nuclear issue, the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula, maintaining peace and stability in the region. South Korea and North Korea’s long-time enemy, however, fragile political mutual trust and strategic conflicts, with the emergence of the North Korean nuclear crisis induced tension on the Korean peninsula - relaxation - to be nervous - and then ease downward spiral.As a close neighbor of the Korean peninsula, for the first time, both support the new regime in Tang dynasty unified the Korean peninsula, the Qing government protect foreign fight side by side in the day Wei was during World War Ⅱ against Japan fascism and the founding of war and the close relationship between China and North Korea are obvious. Today, China is inevitably involved in the Korean nuclear issue. Diplomacy is a continuation of the Interior, for the great cause of national reconstruction and the country’s peaceful rise, each period in China’s diplomatic work is always committed to the country’s economic construction and development to create and maintain a good perimeter security environment. Therefore, even in the case of limited national strength, China is still in the North Korea nuclear crisis for the first time during the morally strongly called for consultation and dialogue to solve the problem of the countries concerned, maintain regional peace and stability. Reform and opening up over more than 30 years, with the increase of national strength and international status, in international and regional affairs, the Chinese should take responsibility to fulfil the obligations, available power is constantly expanding and growing. Meanwhile, the rise of China and international geopolitical changes in the structure of, which prompted the United States return to Asia, once again as a strategic point on the Korean peninsula, balancing the pressure of China’s rise. Therefore, towards a peaceful settlement of the nuclear issue litmus test of China’s rise, China the nuclear policy is taken into the academic community to discuss and research focus.Paper to China towards nuclear policy for research object, to geo political theory for perspective, first part in introduced geo political and importance of based Shang, analysis has current Northeast Asia of geo political new situation, leads has peninsula in geo strategy Shang of importance and the and China of geo relationship history; second part Combs has towards nuclear crisis of development situation, focus research compared has China in previous towards nuclear crisis in the of policy features and similarities and differences of at, antibody out crisis development has China by formed of systematic of towards nuclear policy, Current China always to international nuclear not diffusion system of maintenance who, and Peninsula peace stable of create who, and dialogue negotiations solution problem of promoted who of identity, adhering to objective just of position, insisted facts of attitude, in concern parties due interests of based Shang, to talks promoting on mainly, auxiliary to carefully, and moderate of international sanctions, advocate accountability, strengthening communication coordination and cooperation; to six party talks for subject, carried out six party multilateral diplomatic and bilateral diplomatic interspersed with parallel, Manner taking into account the United Nations promoting the denuclearization of the peninsula and stopped and conversion mechanism delineation of the denuclearization of the peninsula, Peninsula without cause, war, China’s own legitimate national security interests must be effectively maintain and protect the triple bottom line; play a constructive, responsible role, and eventually achieve the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula, the peninsula’s peace and stability, the three main objectives of preventing nuclear proliferation. Finally, several key geopolitical factor in the formation of policy are briefly summarized. Third part for China in towards nuclear Affairs in the of passive dilemma, for to countermeasures recommends:1. in national strategy by development type transformation rise type of special period, academic should strengthening in national security interests, and security strategy aspects of research, to long-term vision and global vision again assessment peninsula geo political of importance, clear China in peninsula of strategy interests constitute; 2. heavy frame and Peninsula national between of relationship--change "North political South by" of Peninsula policy, active building "North by South political" of Peninsula relationship new pattern, While will in the towards relationship into "partners relationship" cascade sequence, on the towards Korea of political power, to as weakening Han beauty League of influence; 3. constantly exploration and active created beauty, and towards, and Han, and in the, and Russian, and day six country in towards nuclear problem Shang of new consensus, power towards nuclear problem of resolve; 4. promoted existing multilateral consultations mechanism General of, and Diego generation of, according to Shi situation love, innovation crisis management thinking and mechanism. Finally this paper argues that although passage between North Korea’s strategic buffer status has declined, the DPRK occasional discordant noise, but with the development of economic globalization and the democratization of international relations, North Korea and China with inherent geographical importance will appear in entirely new ways. So no matter how the international situation changes and change, should continue to work from a strategic and global view of China to develop friendly bilateral relations in the construction, management,.