Research On The Institutional Anti-corruption Construction Since The 18^th National Congress Of The C.P.C

The Communist Party of China has not only gone through sufferings, but also created splendors in more than ninety years since its founding, an important reason lies in the fact that the Party constantly strengthens the various institutional construction itself and makes it keep pace with the times, which fundamentally ensures the Party’s purity and wins people’s minds.Throughout the long-term historical practice of the Party’s construction, fighting against corruption was a major task of the Party’s construction all along. The Party made great achievements in anti-corruption and advocating an honest and clean government since the 18 th National Congress of the C.P.C, the most primary reason depended on the practice of institutional construction. The paper attempts to use institutional anti-corruption as the starting point, analyze the measures and problems in the institutional anti-corruption construction since the 18 th National Congress of the C.P.C, and propose corresponding solutions.First of all, the paper founds on the basic theory of institutional anti-corruption, analyzes the conceptions and features of institutional anti-corruption and summarizes the anti-corruption theory of ancient and modern. Then, the paper sorts out the four periods of the Party’s anti-corruption course since the foundation of PRC. Furthermore, the paper summarizes the innovative measures and the existing problems of the institutional anti-corruption construction since the 18 th National Congress of the C.P.C. The innovative measures focused primarily on the self-regulatory mechanism of not want to rot in the style construction, the safeguard mechanism of not easy to rot in the deepening the reform of political structure, the disciplinary mechanism of not dare to rot by strengthening investigation and punishment of the corruption cases, the prevention mechanism of cannot rot by strengthening the supervision and restriction of public power. Meanwhile, we should improve the party laws and regulations in order to provide legal measure for institutional anti-corruption. The practical difficulties include: there exists a conflict between the formulation and the implementation of anti-corruption system; there is a conflict between the rigidity of anti-corruption system and the flexibility of the executive; there exists a contradiction between theidentity of the dual leadership of Commission for Discipline Inspection and the authority of supervision; there is a conflict between the lagging of the function of anti-corruption system and the costs of anti-corruption. Finally, the paper puts up the suggestions in the future practice based on the problems. Firstly, build a scientific anti-corruption institutional system. Secondly, improve the deterrence of the implementation of institutional anti-corruption. Thirdly, promote the collaboration of anti-corruption supervisory mechanism. Fourthly, promote the normalization of anti-corruption education.