On The Perfection Of The New Rural Social Pension Insurance To The Legal System

With the coming of the China aging society, With "family endowment","land endowment" give priority to rural traditional pension model, In the face of such situation, function of itself, stretched, there is quite a hard. The pilot of the new agricultural insurance system started in2009and2011"social insurance law" has greatly enriched the social security law system in our country, In the aspect of China’s rural social endowment has broken ice forced great significance. However, due to the increased system, it is not perfect, Legislation lags behind, the rules are principles and the regional economic development level is not balanced, In the implementation of the new farming keeps around there are many problems be solved. Each region according to the "guidance" and "social insurance law" to carry out the work of the new type of rural social endowment insurance, unavoidably has the feeling of not. Therefore, to establish and perfect the new rural social endowment insurance legal system is particularly urgent and must be. The author through to the new type of rural social endowment insurance legal system in our country in the western region of QingYang city, GanSu province seven county area of the implementation of the status quo of the field survey, After get the data and carries on the deep analysis, It is concluded that the new type of rural social endowment insurance legal system in the problems that exist in the implementation process, In the analysis of problems and on the basis of the advanced experience of other country, put forward the perfect our country the new type of rural social endowment insurance legal system. Basically has the following Suggestions:First, speed up the construction of new agricultural insurance legislation and provide legal protection system. Second, increase endowment insurance laws and regulations policy propaganda, strengthen the awareness of farmers ginseng. Third, to strengthen the construction of the government itself, improve the level of institutional guarantee. Fourth, deepen judicial reform and realizing judicial safeguard role.