The Empirical Research Of Role Conflict Problem About The Department In Our Colleges And Universities

The dean as a member of the first-line managers in colleges and universities, is the center of the university technology management positions, and the center of the administrative management positions, in the center position of organization structure, role-playing affects the management level of colleges and universities. At the same time, the dean of the department as a discipline leaders, his academic level, novelty, innovation ability affects the university’s academic and educational level. As a result of college expansion, the organizational structure of universities becomes more and more complex, the function is becoming more and more complicated, ask the head of the department of more and more role requirements and expectations. These roles require and expectation act that affects the dean of role-playing, easy to cause the dean of role conflict.This paper uses the role theory to our country university head of the department of system are discussed. The paper on the head of the department of role conflict related concepts and the related theory on the basis of scientific definition, using the role theory to the dean of role conflict in colleges and universities is analyzed, and uses the way of combining quantitative and qualitative research to our country university head of the department of the role of role conflict for empirical. To our country university head of the department’s role behavior and role responsibilities for factor analysis, individuals with department in colleges and universities characteristic difference analysis and variance analysis school characteristics, it is concluded that the dean role conflict. By analyzing the role conflict of discussion, the system served as role conflict generated by positive and negative effects, At the same time, combining with the analysis of the role of the head of the department of American colleges and universities, get this article’s conclusion, and according to the conclusions to take corresponding strategies.