Font Size: a A A

Cancer Village’s "Labeling" And " De-stigmatization"

Posted on:2016-08-30Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:S X LiFull Text:PDF
GTID:2297330473457704Subject:Sociology
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Recently years,cancer villages frequently come into the public’s view.the number is surprised.Government,scholar,media and the public pay more and more attention to it with the increase of death toll.By the literature reading and field survey,I consider that most cancer villages can experience several phases,such as "labelingâ†'enter into policy agendaâ†'the improve of infrastructureâ†'redevelop ".Actually,it is a open wire line in the village’s evolution.But the concealed wiring is the phases over and over again:"pursuit richâ†'get rid of poverty but pathopoiesisâ†'being into poverty by illâ†'throw off poverty and become better off.It is the emersion of development course of the leading industrialized areas after the reform and opening-up policy.Based on the field survey in a henan village found that it conforms to the open wire but inconformity to the concealed one.The village is a traditional agriculture village,there is no industrial nearby the areas.The pollution come from the upstream regions.This village have no experience of pursuit rich.so it is poverty original,lean up the poor after pathopoiesis.When the basic survival is under threat,local natives ally the environmental organization draw their attention,labeled their village successful."Labeling" brought about clean water and neat highway, improve the natives physical and economic condition.But the positive effect is limited.The negative externality exceed the positive effect generate negative effect to the economic of village and county after it go out of the shadow form cancer.Thereout,local native and government union to de-stigmatize turn into the principal pathway of get rid of dilemma.From "labeling" to "de-stigmatization" is a process of construct and reconstruct.In this process,the logic of operation become form living needs to development need.In the second place,in the process of the labeling,action subject is natives,director of the village,media and environmental organization.However.in the "de-stigmatization" process, the main body is natives and basic-level government,contemporary,the basic-level government is main force.In the whole course,case interview and questionnaire survey are the main methods for date collection.Furthermore.I adopt literature research to read up the predecessors’output.In the end, antitheses is also the main methods for our thesis,compared the differences in behavioral agent and action logic between "Labeling"and "De-stigmatization".The study investigates a cancer village from high occur to try best to remove the stigma.It’s a completed vicissitudes process which surpass the localization of existing related research.However,due to the academic attainment of my is not high,the thesis has a lot of room to improve.
Keywords/Search Tags:Cancer villages, Labeling, De-stigmatization, Deconstruction
PDF Full Text Request
Related items