Studies On The Contributing Factors Of Technology Innovation Resources Flow In China Based On Spatial Autocorrelation

Innovation is the key factor for the region’s economic development and the innovation resources provide the region’s innovation activities with necessary material conditions to promise its constant development. Especially the technology innovation resources, it is not only a manifestation of innovation achievement, but also the important foundation for further innovation, it can push regional technological innovation to be more complex and to attain a higher level. How to allocate the technology innovation resource appropriately, or in another word, how to reasonably guide it flowing between regions, will be dramatically affect the development of innovation development in our country.So, Based on the geographical features and socio-economic features, we have, in this paper, constructed multiple space weight matrix, and used Moran’s index、Moran scatter plot and spatial Durbin model to study the space relativity in technology flowing during2006-2012in China. Furthermore, we have found some major factors that impact the flow and divided these factors’ total effect into direct effect and indirect effect. The results of our study can be listed as follows: Technology flow in China has shown spatial agglomeration phenomenon and the main inflow area is the eastern part; Similar geographical features and socio-economic features can strengthen the space relativity; Technology inflows will be increased in both region itself and the adjacent regions if the economic developed and the absorptive capacity of the enterprise enhanced; The level of technological development, the quantity of high-tech industry and human capital stock have had negative effects to the adjacent regions in technology inflow; The negative effects of human capital have been more obvious in the case of socio-economic features.Apart from the introduction of spatial autocorrelation, in this paper, we particularly regard the technology as one kind of innovation resources and emphasize the re-innovation process after the absorption and adoption of the private technology. At present, technologies are often seen as the ultimate innovation achievement instead of the constituent components, but it can’t provide a reasonable answer to the reality. We wish we could help to explain it from a new perspective.