Land for the farmers is not only the simple production material and even the whole contents for their producing and living. Farmers have the indispensable relationship with the land since they have been who they are. In the traditional Chinese culture, land is the badge of identity. The quantity of the land is equal to the fortune the person has owned. In this case, the meaning of the land is not only the carrier for producing activities, but also the value brief and mental hopes for the farmers. Under the influence of the land, our ancestors have increasingly formed their special land value which have a powerful effect on the all aspects of their lives in return, and consequently coming into being an indistinctive farming culture. However, since the reforming and opening-up, our china‘s Market Economic System has been confirmed. The importance of the land for farmers has increasingly been changed. In particularly, land is not the whole for farmers ?activities of the producing and lives any more. The great change for the traditional land value does not only make a great and deep effect on farmers‘ producing and living way, but also on the use of land. Explaining is as following: Due to the surplus labor power has been transformed into the area of non-agricultural industries in the countryside, a plenty of land have been extensive managed, and even been abandoned; Meanwhile, a spot of rural labor power have begun to manage the land in the scale by the way of land circulation, which has endowed the land a brand new value. Most farmers have no longer made use of the land for intensive cultivation and ignored the output of the grain. In order to study the theoretical system of farmers‘ land value and its effect to the land use, the thesis will use the way of Independent Sample T Test to check out the value differences in different classes on the basis of farmer‘s class division, and consequently forming five dimensions on the land value.According to the career character of farmers and different income resource of families, China‘s farmers could be divided into five classes: The large scale contract farmers, small-scale pure agriculture farmers, the first part-time farmers, the second part-time farmers, and non-agriculture farmers. Among them, the small-scale pure agriculture farmers and the second part-time farmers acknowledge the land-basic value further. The first part-time farmers agree with the land-security value; The large scale contract farmers intend to believe the land-rich value; The non-farmers have the same opinion in the land-burden values and land-power values.The thesis embraced five dimensions including land-basis value, land-security value, land-fortune value, land-burden value and land-power value, which has its own theoretical significance. The overall reliability coefficient of the farmer land values is 0.906, partial reliability coefficient is between 0.83 and 0.893. It shows a good consistency in the internal scale. In the whole, the scale has gone through the inspection of convergent validity and division validity, which means, not only could every dimension inspect all different aspects of the land values singly, but also reflect the same point of the land values.The quality protection degree of the cultivated field shows that it is weak, the membership degree in the fourth class is 0.236,which is the biggest; While the quantity protection degree of the cultivated field shows that the farmers protect the cultivated quantity well, the membership degree in the second class is 0.093,which is the biggest; Then the externality protection degree of the cultivated field shows that it is weak, then the membership in the fourth class is 0.0539,which is the biggest. To sum up, the protection degree of the field is worse, the biggest membership degree is in the fourth class, which is 0.156.The structural equation model of farmers‘ land value shows that land-basic value and land-fortune value have more influence on the cultivated field protection than land-security value, land-burden value and land-power value. However, land-burden value and land-power value have a negative impact on the cultivated field protection. On the aspect of quantity protected of cultivated field, land-fortune value is more important, secondly the land-basic value, then thirdly the land-protected value. Land-burden value also has a negative impact on the cultivated field protection as well as land-power value. On the aspect of externality land protection, land-basic value could affect it positively. However, land-security value, land-fortune value, land-burden value, and land-power value affect it less. What is more, land-security value, land-fortune value, land-burden value do it in negative to the contrary. |