Theoretical Study On The Transformation Of The Management Research To Practice

With the era of knowledge economy coming, knowledge is increasingly becoming a productive, management has become a factor of production, management studies of practice has practical necessity and urgency, one of the main sources of management research enterprise to gain competitive advantage. However, in actual practice the process management research, there has been inefficient, disjointed, alienation and other issues, in order to disconnect the most serious problem, has aroused great concern of many scholars and practitioners.This paper analyzes the use of an interdisciplinary approach, theoretical interpretation of the French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu’s habitus field theory as the main theoretical tools, knowledge transfer as a secondary analysis tools framework for building, the management of research into practice the entire Theoretical analysis process.Firstly, this paper analyzes the main management research and practice field in the Field, mainly from the perspective of management science point of view, to identify and analyze the meaning and practice of management research main subject, the mechanism features and management perspective. On the basis of the main analysis, respectively management research field and the practice field of the field structure, habitus and capital competition were analysis.Secondly, the model was constructed barriers Theory of Field and Habitus impact management study of practice, and analyzes the transformation of deep-seated obstacles and secondary barriers. In the model building, first, to practice the process of starting the Management of Field and Habitus Perspective, Nonaka’s SECI model and the four-stage model based Szulanski were constructed transformation management research field and the practice field within the Ministry of model, and then build barriers affect management research model of practice, and dig out the field structure of the conflict, the conflict habitus, deep-seated obstacles to capital conflict transformation as well as the impact of these three language barriers and differences between the two main secondary barriers. With the above model of the domain structure of the conflict on the field, habitus conflict, conflict and other aspects of capital on conversion were analyzed.Finally, based on the above analysis, from the perspective of the field of sociology habitus theory, Theory of Field and Habitus theory put forward countermeasures to improve the management of research to practice transformation. Field habitus perspective as a theoretical reflection strategies, production management and management research study itself to reflect the various premises management research field and the practice field in the domain of the Assumption, institutional arrangements build. Then docking mechanism proposed deep-seated obstacles for the above, as the effect of long-term mechanism to improve the conversion, including field butt, butt body habitus changes, capital docking, and at correcting mechanisms for interaction.