Research On Thetension Of Li Jianwu's Literary Criticism

Li jianwu is our country famous modern novelist,essayist,dramatist and translator,literary critic and french literature' researcher,and is laid the important status in modern literary criticism with his works Critique Collectanea and Critique Collectanea ? writed in 1930 s and 1940 s.The Beijing literary criticism as an important genre in the history of modern Chinese literary criticism has its unique academic connotation,and Li Jianwu's literary criticism as the practical criticism "town",not only has the obvious influence of Western criticism,but also the foundation of Chinese Poetic,form the left-right conflicts of criticism in an attempt to establish a comprehensive and stableand critical pattern.Li Jianwu's criticism is full of the paradoxical combination of different types: freedom and restriction,self and pursuit of justice,the whole aesthetic and microscopic analysis,art and real life,and the paradoxical combination of the elements within the critical text contributes to the aesthetic effect of the construction of the situation in the aspects of criticism connotation and practice method.Li Jianwu not only has the rational comment and the perceptual writing,the exquisite logic analysis method and the astonishing perceptual intuition judgment.The existence of contradictions in the practice method also formed a balance situation,show the active,growing literature' spirit.The contradiction between tension in connotation and practical criticism method,Li Jianwu's literary criticism always persist in "people" and literary ontology regression,which help to improve the character of literary critics,and ordered the construction of the pattern of critical significance for the construction of contemporary literature.In the tension between the criticism connotation and the method,Li Jianwu's literary criticism has always been attached to the literary criticism of "man" and the return of literary ontology,which is helpful to the promotion of literary critics' character and the construction of the pluralistic order of literary criticism.