Performance Of The Democratic System Of Governance Under The Comparative Perspective

From ancient times,democracy is a common topic of academic,social,national,along with the development of the times,democracy is not only limited to people's rights to explore a country or region ownership,become theoretical and practical significance of both universal topics.In 1989,the World Bank for the first time put forward the "crisis of governance",after the "governance" of the topic quickly became the new darling of social science fields.20 after the mid-1990s,the UN(United nations)support,World Bank and other international agencies,the development of the concept of "governance" with its basic practice in Europe and other developed countries have begun to be passed to another Some developing countries;Since then,the "treatment" of the State advanced political and administrative management philosophy began its international tour.This paper argues that the results of democracy and governance performance has inherent logic can not be ignored,grasp the meaning and practice of democracy and the governance of modern means of exploring how to modernize governance and advantages of the path is important.Therefore,this paper will compare the current starting the world's three types of democracy,not only to establish Western-style democracy in order to achieve efficient management of the basic arguments that affect the democratic system of governance performance is bi-directional,multi-dimensional,and not even the only decisive of.This two-way,the impact of multi-dimensional relationship is reflected in:First,the design of the democratic system of governance;the second is the status quo of the democratic system of governance practice;third is mutual recognition between democracy and governance performance,embedded,degree of synergy.On this basis,we propose the following hypothesis:Similarities and Differences between national governance have democracy in a country have an impact,and due to the different democratic system in different study samples,governance synergy actions and practices of democracy are also different,whereby each factor governance performance showing different sort and weights in governance results.Because the extent of the practice of philosophy and practice of governance in different democratic system will be different.Therefore,the author of the world by selecting the most representative of the three types of democracy as the classification criteria,qualitative analysis,quantitative analysis method interspersed in the case of each type to select the most typical sample of the two countries,on the one hand be comparison within the democratic system of governance performance with the other hand,governance performance comparison between different democratic system of governance through logic between democracy and governance.As a typical representative of the Anglo-American development of Western-style democracy,achieved a sustained and effective governance,and to South Korea,Singapore,represented in the governance regime of East Asia also reflects the strong side after the hair,as South Africa,Brazil and a number of new emerging democracies Although the governance level of development is not high but attracted the attention of the world.Why not just more "advanced" democracy triumphed governance performance of it?This paper argues that the success of democratic governance stems from the Anglo-American developed and mature democracy that matches the social environment and cultural needs,and South Korea,while not new with a mature democracy,but in a similar historical change and choose their own democratic governance requirements forms of organization,through continuous adjustment changes adapted to the needs of national governance,and to achieve a high degree of coordinated development of democracy and governance.The success of the East Asian model of democracy not only broke the people of Western democracy and touted fantasy,the more we establish a new address governance modernization path.In the experiment in democracy and governance practices in emerging democracies,the sub-Saharan region widely been tried,although the results vary,but the Western democracies failed to bring timely and efficient management of the consequences,by comparison we will dig synergies democracy and governance development in the core motivation.Governance performance status of development of the country's democratic system of a country and its degree of collaborative governance will have a significant impact,this impact is reflected in the degree of centralization and coordination of democratic governance,democracy and the social.This means that between democracy and governance performance is not a simple positive correlation,but a two-way,interactive multi-dimensional relationship,this governance logic is complex,special,there are certain laws.This article ultimately concludes that the state should implement to enhance,must be established to govern on the basis of a country-specific top democracy,strengthening the synergies between the two main democratic institutions and governance between improving democracy governance performance.Finally,based on the analysis of democracy and governance particularity of the status quo on the modernization of governance demands a clear contemporary China,put forward China to achieve and maintain effective long-term management plan,will be based on national governance and social governance dual synergistic interaction,through the state and society,"interaction" and "multidimensional together" for the realization of the modernization of governance and institutional resources to provide power protection.