Font Size: a A A

A Research On Dealing With The Problem Of Network Public Opinion On Judicial Trial

Posted on:2017-01-02Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:S S ChiFull Text:PDF
GTID:2336330488972123Subject:Legal theory
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
In the modern society justice and the media play a prominent role in the development of the society.Justice as the most authoritative dispute resolution mechanism,plays an irreplaceable role in solving the dispute between the two sides which have conflict of interest,protecting human rights,punishing perpetrators and other aspects to maintain social stability and order.Network as a new media coexisting with the traditional mass media,contains two basic ways of human information communication,interpersonal communication and mass communication.With the characteristics of timeliness,convenience,universality and interactivity,it breaks through the framework of traditional mass media.With the increasing development and popularization of Internet technology,and the growing awareness of human rights and the law in our country,the network has become a significant platform for people to supervise and suggest judicial activities in multi angle,full range,and wide field.In this context,there is a subtle link between network public opinion and judicial trial.The link are both contradictory and unified.Network public opinion,as an important supervision,plays a vital role in promoting public justice,exposing judicial corruption and insuring judicial justice.However,the network is a virtual existence.Within the world of network,the moral and order constraints are relatively vulnerable.What is worse,China's network public opinion,as a means of supervision,starts late.And it is immature both in the network public opinion itself,and its relevant laws and regulations.Therefore,to certain extent,network public opinion poses a potential threat to justice,and leads to conflict and contradiction between itself and justice.Network public opinion has an increasing impact on China's judicial work,and the conflict between network public opinion and judicial trial becomes more apparent.If the conflict between network public opinion and the judicial trial is too sharp,the judicial independence and judicial justice will be harmed,which would decrease the credibility of justice,decrease judicial authority,fail to establish a real awareness of the rule of law among the people,and depress the process of socialist rule of law.Network public opinion,as a double-edged sword,plays a positive role of supervision,while at the same time threats the normal operation of the judicial trial due to its own exposed drawbacks.Thus,it has become a meaningful research topic in current law area to rationally solve the conflict and contradiction between network public opinion and judicial trial,in other words,to achieve the coordinated and balanced development of the two,in order to properly face network public opinion's positive supervising role while minimize its negative influence.This article,using theoretical knowledge of law,through the discussion of network public opinion and the judicial trial,originates from the perspective of the judiciary,studies the influence to judicial trial by network public opinion,analyses the cause of the conflict between current network public opinion and judicial trial,makes a proposal of a way for justice to correctly examine the relations between justice and network public opinion,calmly cope with the influence of network public opinion,reduce the conflict and contradiction between network public opinion and the judicial trial,in order to make a modest contribution to related research concerning network public opinion and judicial trial.
Keywords/Search Tags:network public opinion, judicial trial, theory of law, coping mechanism
PDF Full Text Request
Related items