The Influence Of Internet Media On Judicial Adjudication In "Shame Mother Case"

With the development of Internet technology,new media gradually become an important public platform for public expression,such as WeiBo and WeChat,participation in political and economic life and public opinion supervision.The development of online public opinion in many judicial cases has caused a round of waves,and the penetration and influence of different degrees in the judicial field has become an indisputable fact.Based on a hot network in 2017-"shame mother case" as the research object,through the "mother" shame occurred after the review and public opinion,analyze network public opinion play a different role in different stages of public opinion,reproduce the actual situation of the present our country network public opinion influence the judicial activities,and focus on growing in recent years,the judicial ethics dilemma under the environment of Internet dissemination of new problems and new form.Judging from the case trial operation system,the Internet public opinion hastens the judicial organ’s response and promotes the judicial investigation.On March 26 th,the public inspection law made a voice on weibo,and comprehensively investigated the case of the case of "happy intentional injury" and sent the commissioner to shandong to collect evidence and improve the efficiency of handling cases.Judging from the result of judicial sentencing,the case has been sentenced to five years imprisonment from life imprisonment to second instance,and the network "public opinion" has played an important role.Of first instance verdict,experts and scholars,celebrities,media and Internet users actively involved in the case of judicial discussion,lies in the huan "whether for justifiable defense","whether intentional killing" and "filial whether guilty" issues,such as to give advice to the judicial authority has provided important reference;From the perspective of judging factors,the internalization of traditional filial piety ethics and the humanistic care of the law make the "favor" considerations affect the rationality of judicial decisions.In this case,the online discussion of "ethics and favor" is also determined by the combination of Chinese law,theory and emotion,and the current situation of the development of judicial rule.Based on facts and take law as the criterion of justice,China always attaches great importance to the public opinion through public opinion,attaches great importance to the rules,the public opinionbehind the case,traditional ethics will be a judge consideration factors,to some extent promote the judicial justice,to realize the justice of law.But at the same time,the "public opinion" amplified by the online public opinion can interfere with the judicial process and undermine the judicial authority.At the end of the paper,the author puts forward some practical Suggestions,such as enhancing the sense of responsibility of mainstream media,standardizing online media and advocating rational participation of netizens,in order to promote the positive interaction between public opinion and justice.