The Dilemma Between Liberal Razor And Gradual Social Engineering Theory

This article mainly analyzes and discusses two points of Popper's political philosophy—the liberal razor and the progressive social engineering theory.Through the exploration of the concept of related concepts,the relationship between the concept of combing,and strive to reveal its theoretical predicament.The text is roughly divided into five parts: the first part explains the origin of the topic and the intention to discuss the issue;the second part describes the relevant literature works and research status;the third part starts from Popper's ideological stance and analyzes his decision on history.The criticism of Holism and Holism reveals his motives and appeals for creating progressive social engineering and related theories.The fourth part focuses on Popper's “Liberal Razor” principle and its derivative concepts,such as “minimum country” and “minimum pain”.Principles,specifically discriminating the meanings of these concepts,review them.The fourth part reviews Popper's theory of progressive social engineering.The fifth part is the evaluation of Popper's political thoughts.On the one hand,it points out the inherent contradictions of Popper's political thoughts and reveals the dual relationship between the principle of “Liberal Razor” and the theory of “progressive social engineering”: both are not only theoretically Adherence to the relationship,as well as the concrete relationship in practice.The "Liberal Razor" principle fundamentally restricts the realization of the "gradual social engineering" theory.If the former is used as a basis,the latter will be unable to move to another utopia-and this is exactly the biggest criticism target of Popper's political philosophy.On the other hand,Popper emphasizes the rational factors and lofty values of the political ideal of "progressive social engineering" and can gain valuable lessons from it.