| Studing and discussing the young Marx and mature Marx's thought the relationship lasted only Marxist philosophical studies in the field, as an enduring classic problem. This document does not purport to Althusser as research, but to re-examine the relationship between the young Marx and mature Marx Althusser through this bridge.Young Marx and mature Marx thought have obvious distinction, the most of researchers also paid great attention to this difference. But on the whole, although the study of both the differences and relations of the more in-depth, but most scholars is the recognition of differences in research conducted on the basis of both continuity. However, I believe that, although there are obviously different characteristics, but Althusser thought staging the young Marx and mature Marx is still a damage to the integrity of research and development of Marx's thought, the young Marx and mature Marx Andean staging, is a departure from Marx Thought reference to the law of development, which will result in the release of both mutual understanding Marx many difficulties, they are worth reflection.Althusser is regarded as Marx staging as a support representative writer in which the young Marx and mature Marx thought a total own core problems, the former still belonging to Hegel and Feuerbach discourse and the following one only entering the general question of historical materialism, both of between an "epistemological rupture." Young Marx relations between young and the mature Marx is not "beyond" but "break away" mature Marx represents a complete break of the early ideas. This idea profoundly reveals the fundamental differences between the young Marx and mature Marx, dig out the deep background of this difference. however, being two completely parts, it will lead to a lack of mature Marxist ideological and theoretical source of the dilemma, the final become death water. Althusser see Marx's thought is Marxism-first individual as a carrier, and as a source of support and the creation of Marx's own spiritual growth can not be separated, although the young Marx from Feuerbach in this school care, but Without this departure, there will be a lot of material accumulation and practice experience, it is difficult to arrive at a final theoretical results of historical materialism. The emergence of historical materialism, is the inevitable result of the process of the early Marxist thought throughoutly countless material and numerous practical education Marx and the like.Althusser clarification of the young Marx and mature Marx distinguish misunderstanding, you need to put on Marx different times by various levels and dimensions of interpretation, rather than limited to a single dimension to explore. This paper attempts to explore different ideas of Marx's thought staging care dimension in order to better understand the relationship between the status of Marxist thought at different times and re-examine between us.This paper is divided into three parts:The first part focuses on the general question of the concept of the structure itself, from the perspective of the internal structure of the total problem, he pointed out that the “total problem” is a static concept, which were rooted problems overall problem of static logical structure of inquiry. Althusser will own a “total problem” recognized as a structured existence, for thinkers have first, thinker always based ideology in their total scope of the problem is located. But this static problem lack of their total history of the world and the future expectations, thus becoming the thinking is difficult, and the total problem from a deeper sense is an expression rather than exist in not a decisive, but the Description ideological stage, three of thinking can not fully support the overall problem of the core concepts, so the “total problem”, whether from their own definition, theoretical principles and methodological principles can not be entirely convincing. Therefore, it is difficult to introduce such a conclusion from the general problem: the young Marx and mature Marx in Sri Lanka so the two are at different stages of the total possible problems.The second part is out of the total structural problems, focusing on support for the overall issue of Althusser outside the general question were raised- "epistemological rupture" and reflect on old age on it. Firstly, "epistemological break" the basic core, in order to determine the starting point of discussion,but it is not through the analysis of the possibility of "epistemological rupture", the external from the total problem, that is, the relationship between the angle of the total problem, indicating no possibility of breakage, thus indicating the overall problem can not be absolutely independent existence as was thought and therefore the young Marx and mature Marx fracture is impossible; secondly, a reasonable point to explore on their own reflection Althusser and defects is on the one hand through the rational aspect of Althusser's make self-criticism, and further stated that "General Issue" and "epistemological break " impossibility; on the other hand, pointed out that Althusser's self-criticism is still not beyond their preliminary thinking on the breadth of vision, and there is no relationship between the thinker and thought distinguish itself, thus it is unconvincedFinally, the third part looks at Marx as a thinker, as a creator and carrier of Marxist ideas, who have their spiritual growth dimension and this dimension is precisely follow the track became Marx's thought. The first two parts from the total problem, or said internal ideological analysis, problem analysis from the outside overall relationship between different ideas, but they were limited to internal speech Althusser's system, although you can not always plan view Althusser's whole system and propose solutions on the general idea. The first two parts of the structure is described by Althusser to Marx staging of impropriety, and the third part is the personal growth of Marxist Thought constructivist dimensions set forth the young Marx and mature Marx unity.Only out of the system outside, focusing on Marx's own spiritual development and learning dimension of Marx's thought occurs to open up new horizons. Here, I will Althusser roots of "epistemological rupture" error attributed to Althusser to linear thinking to understand Marx. This linear thinking, lack of awareness of temporality model, while epitomized "epistemological break," but also because the structure of understanding Marx's thought caused. First, the young Marx and mature Marx who contain the other side of the issue which has been a classic Althusser's questions, but he can not prove that the mature Marx can be found in the young Marx.But I pointed out that this is wishful thinking on his internal system. Second, beyond Althusser's language domain, the distinction between Marx and Marx as a thinker thought staging staging, certainly Marx's own growth, practice and accumulation of material relative to the first position in Marx's thought. With "Homer" the "Iliad" and "Odyssey" represents the spiritual journey of enlightenment young and mature Marx relationship of Marxist Thought and non-releasable, thus proving the structure of the overall problem can only be built on the generated above ideology, and not be able to generate ideas under the overall problem. Ultimately the young Marx and mature Marx staging is a reasonable formulation should deeply reflect on the theoretical outcome. |
PDF Full Text Request