Performance Evaluation And Comparative Analysis Of Different Collective Forest Tenure Reform

The reform of collective forest right system takes "clear property right,the management right,implement the right of disposal,protection of the right to return" as the main content.Promoting the transformation of the mode of forest management and enriching forestry management body are of practical significance for promoting the income of farmers,harmonious of society,as well as growth of resource.In order to compare the difference between "average forest for each family" and "average shares and profit",two modes after the reform of collective forest right system.Objectively evaluate the discrepancies existed in the economy,society and ecology of the two modes.Also to further deepen the reform of collective forest and put forward suggestions to crack forestry multi-benefit contradiction.In this study,different modes of village collective forest right reform of Fujian province were taken as the main research object.Performance evaluation system of forestry reform was established based on the investigation,the comprehensive performances of the two modes were compared and analyzed.On this basis,through analyzing the factors that influence the management intention of forest farmers,and finally put forward countermeasures and suggestions to improve the performance of forestry management.This research is based on the theory of property rights,policy evaluation theory,and in combination of the frequency analysis method,theoretical analysis method and expert consultation method.Performance evaluation index was selected from the three dimensions of economic,society and ecology,and then evaluation index system was established.For economic benefit evaluation,indices including operating efficiency,per capita income,per capita forest forestry family income are the main aspects.For social benefits,satisfaction evaluation of the indices such as the way of dividing forest,the difficulty degree of applying logging index,resolution of forest rights dispute,forest right mortgage policy,the efficiency of issuing forest right certificate,forestry income,and the other seven aspects.The ecological benefits mainly lie in forest volume per unit area,forest coverage,forest structure and tree structure.The main conclusions got by comparing and appraising the discrepancies of comprehensive performances of the two reforming modes are as follows:In the aspect of economic benefit,management efficiency of the two modes of forest right reform needs to be further improved;the per capita of forestry income and per capita household income of "average forest for each family" mode is higher than those of"average shares and profit";in social terms,the satisfaction degree of the two forest right reform modes were not desirable,among which,evaluation index of forest right mortgage loan is the lowest.The relative different satisfaction degree of the indices of "average forest for each family" and "average shares and profit" are forestry income and the efficiency of issuing forest right certificate.In ecological benefits,forest volume per unit area and forest coverage of "average shares and profit"model is higher than those of "average forest for each family";the both are in favor of the management of timber forest,for example,high economic value,economic risk,the risk of small natural forest species.For further analysis of factors affecting the performance of forestry,the farmers are willing to engage in forest management as a starting point,through the logistic regression analysis showed that,forest area,forest risk size and whether the forest rights disputes will significantly affect the forest management.According to the above conclusions,suggestions to deepening the reform of collective forest right system,promoting economic growth,maintaining social stability and good ecological were put forward.First,promoting effective allocation of forestry production factors to guide the moderate scale management of land;second,promoting forest warrants to every households,and improving the forest right mortgage loan service;third,increasing the diversity of forest tree species diversity and improving the stability of forest resources;Fourth,promote forestry economic growth and raise the will of forest farmers.