Korean Negative Meaning Causation Clauses And Chinese Corresponding Forms

Both Korean and Chinese have negative meaning causation clauses.However,there are significant differences in the concept of "causal relationships" and"negative meaning",usages,and construction of corresponding.Therefore it is challenging to parallel between these two languages.This paper discovered the Chinese forms more precisely correspond to five causal suffix in Korean.Analyzes the reasons which bring differences about meanings and usages of forms in Korean and Chinese.And then explaining how these differences contribute to challenges in comparing and then providing the solution for those challenges.It can bring insights to the teaching in Korean and Chinese.Chapter one:Review previous studies,introduction of research contents,significance and methodology.Chapter two:Determine five Korean causal suffix forms "N(?),V(?)((?)),V(?),V/N((?))(?),V/A/N((?))(?)" and five Chinese conjunctions"??,??,??,??,??”commonly used in negative meaning causation clauses.Compare concept of "causal relationship" and "negative meaning" in Korean-Chinese.Chapter three:Minutely limned the semantic,pragmatic features Korean-Chinse five meaning forms.Chapter four:Based on non-correspondence in Korean causal suffix and Chinese conjunction,discovered the Chinese forms more precisely correspond to five negative meaning causation clauses forms in Korean.And point out that when Chinese comparing with Korean(causal suffix)as well as conjunction there must add some word to fill up the meaning.Chapter five:Minutely analyze differences in forms between Korean-Chinese"causal relationship" and "negative meaning".Point out the different role of forms,in Korean causal suffix emphasize "semantic",but in Chinese conjunction emphasize "logic".Chapter six:Tease out the above results,and bring insights to Korean and Chinese teaching based on chapter three,four,five results.Evaluate the strengths and the weaknesses of the paper.