Font Size: a A A

Research On Textology Of Han Feizi In The Republic Of China

Posted on:2020-02-29Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:G LiFull Text:PDF
GTID:2405330596467466Subject:Ancient Chinese literature
Abstract/Summary:
The introduction discuss the causes of writing Research on Textology of Han Feizi in the Republic of China,and briefly reviews the researchful status of Han Feizi since the founding of the People’s Republic of China,and puts forward the methods of writing this paper.The first chapter is an overview of the textual research about Han Feizi in the Republic of China,there are significant improvement about researching Han Fei and his book.Starting from the textual research on Han Feizi by those scholars,Chen Qianjun’s textual research on the year of birth of Han Fei has become the cornerstone of the current academic discussion on the birth year of Han Fei.Secondly,Lots of scholars do the textual research of 55 articles during this period,the hot spot of discussion is textual criticism about Chu Jian Qin.As for the author of this article,someone think it’s written by Zhang Yi,someone convince it’s written by Han Fei,someone hold the view it’s written by Cai Ze,someone think it’s written by lv Buwei,the scholar hold the third opinion research the era of chapter convincingly,and it provides the foundation of researching on the author of this chapter.Nevertheless,scholars think that Rong Zhaozu or Liu Rulin puts forward the view that this chapter is written by Cai Ze firstly in academical circles,this article emphasically affirms that Liu Zhongying is the first person who think Cai Ze is the author who write Chu Jian Qin as finding new material Han Feizi Chu Jian Qin Pian Bian Zheng.Finally,the reading notes,all-sided annotation and papers of Han Feizi are reviewed and remarked as a whole.The second chapter is the research about the textual works of the notes about Han Feizi in the Republic of China,the major part of checking and interpreting this book are notes,this paper choose the most important four notes as follows: Tao Hongqing’s The Reading Notes about Han Feizi,Liu Wendian’s Han Feizi Jianduan Ji,Gao Heng’s Han Feizi Bujian,Yu Xingwu’s Shuangjianyi Han Feizi Xin Zheng.The Reading Notes about Han Feizi,those textual criticisms and explanations are according to Wu Zi’s version which carves the book written in emperor qiandao of Song dynasty,and refers to the version of Dao Zang,Zhao Yongxian,Zhang Bang,ling Yingchu to revise errors of text,His textual research and interpretation commonly uses methods of mutual evidence about context,mutual evidence with other articles in the same book and mutual evidence about the notes in Song dynasty,multiply to the point of philology and phonology to research,great efforts have been made in correcting errors of sentences by paying attention to grammar,and often supply missing words and delete derivatives on the basis of ideas.Han Feizi Jianduan Ji,his text is according to version of Wu Zi which carving the book written in emperor qiandao of Song dynasty,Dao Zang,and Zhao Yongxian,there are more than 10 notes in the 73 collation questions about text and the old notes in Song dynasty that predecessors have not text,most of the items are to correct collation by scholars in Qing dynasty and testify it by listing examples in numerous ancient books.Han Feizi Bujian are textual criticisms and explanations in accordance with version of Han Feizi Jijie,it takes a lot of energy to correct previous errors in collation and annotation in this book.Meanwhile,the author adjust the disorder of words,revise errors of character pattern from the perspective of transformation about character pattern,and it plays a large part that rectify collations and annotations of old notes,Gu Guangying,Yu Yue,Sun Yirang,Wang Xianqian,and Wang Xianshen.Gao Heng is also skillfully in exegesis by referring to a bulk of ancient books,he collate and annotate words of Han Feizi and often research interchangeable words by comparring variant reading in different books,it can be convinced that Gao Heng makes great academical achiecement in this book and the book is the top one in those notes about Han Feizi in the period of the Republic of China.Shuangjianyi Han Feizi Xin Zheng,the author itemizes and researchs the text according to Han Feizi Jijie,those collations and annotations except which are originated from Han Feizi Jijie,are quoted from Tao Hongqing and Wu Kaisheng.The most obvious feature of the book is using inscriptions on ancient bronze objects in quantity,and the majority of this book is researching collations and annotations of Han Feizi Jijie,the scholar object to the phenomenon that predecessors alter,add and delete words many times,and he spend oceans of time to criticize the shortcoming that Han Feizi Jijie alter words according to genus-books and others rashly.He often make text smoothly and supplement the lack of Han Feizi Jijie by recognizing interchangeable words.The third chapter is the research on Han Feizi Jiaoshi which written by Chen Qitian,this book is the second monograph which covers all explanations in the academical history of Han Feizi,the scholar search the version of Hanzi Yu Ping and Wang Daokun to compare and collate.The first-line achievement is that the monograph covers all explanations from abundant material,it not only base on the scholars’ research of Qing dynasty,but also compile plentiful academical success which achieved by republican-period and Japan scholars.Additionaly,he guides sections and chapters to new system which includes 10 volumes,and reject totally old sections and chapters,which in accordance with its importance and fact or fiction,etc.The scholar divide every chapter into new paragraph,and also augment punctuations,there are popular tendency in making all-sided annotations about the text of Han Feizi.It points out that there are four features about Textology of Han Feizi in the Republic of China in the conclusion:it inherit scholars’ in Qing dynasty methods of scholarly research and achievements of textual criticisms and explanations,it’s abundant in quoting academical material,they attach importance to distinguish the false,the tendency is changed from loose research to summary.
Keywords/Search Tags:Han Feizi, the Republic of China, textual research, collate and annotate, note
Related items