A Report On Consecutive Interpreting For Global Autism Project From The Perspective Of The Interpreting Dynamic RDA Model

This article is a report on the practice of CI interpreting.The task described was the author's interpretation work for the Global Autism Project in 2018.Autism experts from all over the world stationed in Nanchang Huicong Autism Rehabilitation Center for training.The interpreting project was carried out in three forms: daily class observations,evening training and a seminar.Due to the time and text limitations,the author uses the seminar interpreting as the research material for this report,combined with the theory of the interpretation of the dynamic RDA Model.As an inexperienced postgraduate majored in interpreting,and also the only interpreter of the seminar,the author has encountered many difficulties and doubts in pre-task preparation and the interpretation process.The practice of interpreting needs to be guided by a certain theory.Through the study of the theory of interpreting dynamic RDA Models,the author gradually solved the problems in preparation phase.Under the guidance of the theory,the author's interpreting process was relatively smooth.However,after the task by listening to the recording,the author also found many deficiencies.This report will combine the dynamic RDA Model of interpreting proposed by Professor Lai Yihua(2012).Based on the author's own practice,the author applied the theories from the dynamic model,namely Relevance,Deverbalization and Adaptation,and unfold the case study of the theory and the interpretation process one by one correspondingly.Through case analysis,the following findings are obtained: 1.Listening and the comprehension of the utterance is the premise and foundation of the interpreting task;2.Information processing in the brain is vital before the language output;3.The target language expression should be smooth,pleasant and adapt to the audience;4.The interpreting dynamic RDA Model is instructional in the interpreting process;5.An interpreter has his/her subjectivity in the interpreting process.