Research On The Relationship Between Network Public Opinion Supervision And Judicial Independence

According to the data from China's Internet Information Office,as of December 2017,the number of Internet users in China has reached 772 million,and the Internet penetration rate is 55.8%.From this it can be seen that the network has an increasingly widespread impact on our lives and has had an undeniable impact on the production and life of all sectors of the public in all industries.The Internet,while providing us with rich information,has become the "microphone" for the public to express their views.The public through the Internet channels,you can make an unceredible expression of their own anonymity,so gather all kinds of voices of the network platform has become the storm of media concentration.With the increasing number of Internet users,Internet users in the use of the network,but also gradually from the entertainment section to focus on news and national political policies on the change.It is understandable that one of the focuses of online public opinion that judicial judgment becomes more and more legal consciousness.Judicial adjudication,as the last line of defense in safeguarding social fairness and justice,has drawn more and more attention from the general public about its development trend.In addition,such cases tend to have higher public opinion values and thus attract more attention from Internet users.In recent years,many judicial cases that have occurred,such as the "shameless murder case",the"Shandong Vaccine Case" and the former "Li tianyi case",the "Pharmacy Xin case" and the "Xu Ting case" that recently detonated the media carnival,Internet users are eagerly watched.This shows that the popularization and development of the Internet provide a convenient channel for the general public to carry out public opinion supervision.In the relevant judicial cases,the netizens get justified and the parties have been fairly tried.Judicial supervision by the internet public opinion is more helpful to the judiciary Just realization.In spite of this,the online media supervision is still a "double-edged sword." Due to the advantages of the Internet and its rapid and timely dissemination,individual media and Internet users do not have the opinions and opinions expressed in the communication process.It must conform to the facts of the law and the truth of the case.Such unreasonable public opinion on the Internet easily interferes with the fairness and independence of judicial trials.Therefore,it is necessary to rationally guide the network public opinion to properly supervise the judicial activities,comprehensively analyze the advantages and disadvantages of its supervision,objectively face the defects and carry out countermeasures so as to make the network public opinion supervise scientifically,rationalize and standardize the network public opinion supervision and judicial independence And maintain social fairness and justice so as to provide an effective means of supervising judicial independence.This article focuses on the conflict between the supervision by the internet and the independence of the judiciary and the underlying causes of the conflict between the two and the countermeasures to resolve the conflict between the two.The elaboration process followed the principle of superficiality,depth and rationality,so that objective analysis and clear identification of the contradictions between the two can be made.Due to the public's incomplete understanding,inadequate and thorough understanding of the relationship between the supervision of the media and the independence of the judiciary,and the incompleteness of the law on this aspect and the backwardness of the judicial system,many other reasons have seriously hindered the Positive interaction.Therefore,after a detailed analysis of the conflicts and reasons between the supervision by the public on the Internet and the independence of the judiciary,this article,based on the actual situation in our country and by drawing on the advanced experience of other countries,proposes the unique solution to the conflict between the supervision by the public on the Internet and the independence of the judiciary The countermeasure is the key content discussed in this article,but also the necessity of this article.This article intends to study the judicial independence of internet public opinion supervision through four chapters.The first part is an overview of the internet public opinion supervision and judicial independence.The second part is an overview of the relationship between internet public opinion supervision and judicial independence.The third part is network public opinion supervision and judicial The fourth part analyzes the reasons for the independent conflict,and the fourth part is the countermeasures to construct the rational relationship between the supervision by the internet public opinion and the independence by the judiciary.The main purpose of this article is to strengthen the role of internet public opinion supervision in promoting judicial independence.Because the internet public opinion supervises the judicial independence,which is a kind of oversight mechanism that citizens participate extensively.As the judiciary can not evade and dodge,it should respond actively and analyze the current network The public opinion supervision carries on the reasonable guidance and is not afraid of the supervision and accusation of the public opinion so that the public can directly understand the current judicial state and let the online public opinion play a positive role in this "double-edged sword.”...