The Reasonableness Argument Of Modern Anthropocentrism

The first part of the paper examines the background of the modern anthropocentrism,and defines the definition of human anthropocentrism at home and abroad,its connotation,form,historical evolution,and “anthropocentrism”.A review of the questions that are responsible for the current ecological crisis,the issues of “walking out” or “walking in” anthropocentrism,and non-anthropocentrism related research.This paper argues that no matter which perspective,they are directed against the contemporary Philosophical and Ethical Reflections on the Global Ecological Crisis.From the perspective of anthropocentrism,the contemporary global ecological crisis is caused by the concept of “conquering” nature that blindly produces,lives,and behind human beings.To change or get rid of the crisis,it is not a method to obtain “material from outside the body.” Instead,they take their own minds,reflect on themselves,and highlight the core role of human beings in creating and escaping the crisis.This point has important value and positive significance.The second part of the paper mainly elaborates the essence of modern anthropocentrism.First,it elaborates the historical process of modern anthropocentrism,from the ancient anthropocentric central theory,the theological human anthropocentrism to the modern ontological human-centered theory,to the rational and self-conscious modern anthropocentrism,and through the combing of this historical process,An analysis of the differences in anthropocentrism under different historical patterns highlights the progressive nature of modern anthropocentrism.Secondly,it makes a clear definition of modern anthropocentrism.From the definition of “human”,it points out that the “human” of modern anthropocentrism is the unification of natural and social people,with the characteristics of the class subject and the temporal sustainability.From the definition of the “center”,it is pointed out that modern anthropocentrism stipulates the rationality of human subjectivity,and then elaborates the concrete connotation of modern anthropocentrism.Third,it briefly introduced several basic factions of modern anthropocentrism.The third part of the thesis mainly uses Marx's view of practice to expound the rationality of modern anthropocentrism.First of all,Marx's view of practice holds that human beings have the nature of “undeterminedness”,the natural non-self-requiringness needed,and the initiative of consciousness.They come from the nature of nature.At the same time,these three natural characteristics generate the practicality and subjectivity of human beings.Two basic social characteristics.Practicality and subjectivity make people from the very beginning have an ego-centered position in the relationship between human and the natural environment.That is,people must first transform the natural world as a means or tool for their own survival and development.The natural world,Therefore,Marx's view of practice affirms the relationship between man and nature in modern anthropocentrism and affirms that nature is the object of human practice.In the relationship between man and nature,man is in the main position and is the “center”.Second,Marx's view of practice holds that the relationship between man and the natural world is both a process of creation and objectification,and a process of knowledge and value between the subject and the guest.The essence of this process is “the subject is the person and the object is the nature.” The satisfied and satisfied relationship between the person as the subject and the subject as the object with interests.Therefore,Marx's view of practice holds that nature does not have an independent intrinsic value.The value of nature is expressed in the sense that it is the basis for the existence and development of human beings and can satisfy human needs.Therefore,it is only a tool value and means value.The purposeful value of the person who leaves the subject and the instrumental value of the natural thing will also be lost.From this,Marx's concept of practice denies the view of non-anthropocentrism that natural has intrinsic value,and confirms the relationship between human and nature's value subject and object of modern anthropocentrism.Third,Marx's view of practice holds that the essential characteristics of practice are transformative and revolutionary.The essential characteristics of the subject are initiative,purpose,and autonomy.The combination of the two is the human's “selfhood”,that is,Self-centered,that is,adherence to anthropocentrism,affirms that human practicality and ontology are the roots of anthropocentrism.At the same time,Marx's view of practice believes that to resolve the contradiction between man and nature and eventually to abandon the value proposition of anthropocentrism,it must rely on the solution of the social contradictions between man and man.The ultimate goal is to eliminate the alienating exploitation system and achieve communism.The fourth part of the dissertation discusses the theoretical and practical significance of the rationality of modern anthropocentrism.This article believes that modern anthropocentrism has its irrevocable rationality.This rationality is based on the subjectivity and values of human self-consciousness based on Marx's view of practice,and enriches Marxist ecological philosophy theory.At the theoretical level,it can developed Marxist dialectical view of nature,provided a theoretical basis for building a community of human destiny,and achieved sustainable development.At the practical level,it has the practice of guiding the transformation of human technological forms,guiding the transformation of human survival methods,and exploring ways to solve environmental problems.significance.