Font Size: a A A

A Study On Running Of Grassroots Justice In Southern Xinjiang

Posted on:2019-08-29Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:Z S ZhangFull Text:PDF
GTID:2416330566991882Subject:Marxism Ethnic Theory and Policy
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
China has a vast territory.It is impossible to describe the specific conditions of judicial operation in one or two words.The specific conditions of grassroots judicial operations in southern Xinjiang cannot be obtained simply from the text,and we need to visit the grassroots judicial operations in southern Xinjiang.The front line was actually examined.Under the background of modern society,on the one hand,we are required to pursue the modern legal order and the judicial system.On the other hand,we must adapt to the material and cultural conditions of rural society and inject the knowledge,ethics,and customs of the grassroots society into the judiciary.Therefore,clarifying the process of the judicial operation in the grassroots of southern Xinjiang is related to the process of legalization throughout Xinjiang and even the whole country.This paper uses field investigation methods,case analysis methods,and interdisciplinary research methods.Based on theories of law,sociology,and ethnology,it conducts field research on some grass-roots courts in the Kashi region of southern Xinjiang and their dispatched courts,based on the grassroots society in southern Xinjiang.The custom,culture,and economic conditions of the region place the judicial operation process in these areas into these objective environments.It discusses the basic situation of courts in the judicial operation in the southern Xinjiang,the composition of the judges,and how they function in judicial operations.We will embark on an elaboration and analysis of the trial process of the case to realize the understanding of the judicial operation of the grassroots in the southern part of the country and,in turn,provide comprehensive and accurate information for the rule of law.The research content of this paper is divided into six parts.The first part is the introduction,expounding the general situation,basic concepts,research objects and significance of Kashgar,domestic and foreign research review,research contents and research methods;the second part is from the judicial administration of local courts.The situation of the judicial resources allocation in the primary courts of southern Xinjiang and their difficulties are discussed in three aspects: the establishment of trial resource management departments,the lack of personnel,and the weakening of judicial review functions.The basic qualities of political consciousness,ability to use judicial knowledge flexibly,and ability to know local knowledge are sufficient for their current job needs.Finally,the judges of the courts of the southern primary courts are pursuing the mediation rate when handling disputes.Mediation cannot enter.After the trial,it is also necessary to prevent the expansion of the situation;in the fourth part,the specific process of handling disputes in the grassroots courts of South Xinjiang,the majority of marriage cases in the grassroots courts of the southern Xinjiang,the increasing number of cases caused by social transformation,and the characteristics of accepting cases where administrative litigation cases are basically zero are discussed.In the case of filing,the trial was not separated but In order to resolve social disputes in a more timely and effective manner,more national customs are used in the mediation process,and the judgment result of the case is largely pursued during the trial;the sixth chapter is the conclusion,and the social environment has resulted in the judicial operation of the grass-roots level.Deeply influencing,in turn,the state should exercise reasonable use of social,economic,and cultural factors in the exercise of its judicial power in order to better apply the law,shape the law,and finally realize the social order of the rule of law.However,we must not forget the function and role of judicial trials.The courts must position themselves as a national judicial authority.The judicial outcome cannot be compromised by social effects.This is detrimental to judicial authority and is not conducive to the promotion of the rule of law in society.The rule of law in social governance.
Keywords/Search Tags:Grass-roots Judicial Operation, Bouthern Border, Court, Judge, Adjudication
PDF Full Text Request
Related items