| The basic court is the trial line,there are more than 90% of the cases are heard by grassroots courts and judicial reform,especially after the nationwide implementation of the system of judges management,how to effectively assess the performance of grass-roots court judge posts,is to ensure the amount of judges of high quality and high level,at the same time but also to ensure that key staff of the court team stable.The posts judge performance evaluation as the research object,using the theory of institutional economics,task performance and relationship performance,first of all to our country the performance appraisal system and the Nanxi District Court judge posts the current situation of performance appraisal are introduced;secondly,the existing problems and the reasons of the performance appraisal method of Nanxi District of posts in the analysis;finally,for domestic and international experience summed up on the basis of relevant countermeasures.At the same time pay attention to the theory and practice of the research paper,using the method of literature research and empirical research method and comparative research method,case analysis method,and the combination of theory and practice,as a grass-roots court-Yibin city Nanxi District Court judge post performance evaluation as the research object,studied the problem and reason analysis China and Nanxi court judge,and finally put forward the Countermeasures of their own.The article points out that the legal system of the Nanxi court judge post performance appraisal assessment is not perfect,the fuzzy evaluation organization,evaluation method is simple and stiff,part of the assessment content is not consistent with the characteristics of the post evaluation index,accurate scientific assessment results is not enough,make full use of such problems.At the same time to solve these problems,in the current legal and policy suggestions for the case,put forward the strict performance appraisal principle,form a system file,timely into the law,a clear assessment organization,enrich the evaluation method,to further clarify the appraisal object,to optimize the assessment index system of scientific and reasonable use of evaluation results and suggestions. |