The Dilemma Of Plastic Restriction Order' Implementation

The system is a well-known,human-set,restrictive rule that determines people's i nterrelationships and is used to suppress opportunistic behaviors that may occur in hu mans.The Plastic Limit Order has been implemented for ten years,and there is a dil emma that the implementation effect will not decrease.Now,“limited” or “unlimited”,“forbidden” or “not ban” has become a problem for the government.Should we comp romise with the real dilemma or change the string and change it? The Prohibition Ord er proposed by the deputies of people's congresses across the country has its realistic rationality and economic rationality.However,under the demand for plastic products a s packaging for express delivery and take-out,the implementation of the decade is onl y based on the existence of "implementation dilemma".Is the "speed limit order" turn ed into a more "destructive order" to deviate from reality? When there is a conflict b etween habits,policies,and laws,what is “limited” or “unlimited”,and why is it “lim ited” without reduction? How to use the legal incentive system to re-regulate the beha vioral choices of the "restricted plastics" behavior subject,choose the best solution fro m it,and get rid of the "plastic limit order" implementation dilemma? For the above three aspects,the paper plans to use empirical analysis and normative analysis in law and economics,"rationalist choice" theory,legal incentive system,"social cost-benefit" theory and maximization principle analysis as analysis and research.The thesis consists of five parts.The first part is the factual and theoretical comb ing.It carries out empirical analysis on the promulgation and execution status of the “plastic limit order”,which leads to three problems in the research of the thesis,and c ombs the literature of the existing scholars.The second part is the root cause of the i mplementation of the "plastic limit order",the imbalance of responsibility sharing amo ng the actors in the implementation of the "plastic limit order",the conflict with the s ocial habits,the use of "rational people" and "rent-seeking" in law and economics The theory "analyzes the root cause of the implementation of the "plastic limit order";the third part,using the theory of "social cost-benefit" in game theory and law and econo mics,to build between consumers,between sellers,between production companies,Un der the assumption of “rational people”,each behavioral subject is driven by the maxi mization of self-interest,and the behavioral choice between the actors must inevitably lead to a “plastic limit order”.The implementation of difficult social phenomena leads to the construction of incentive mechanisms for the perpetrators;the fourth part is to continue the implementation of the “plastic limit order” of exploratory institutional arra ngements,how to continue to implement The "plastic limit order" is an urgent proble m that the current legislature needs to solve.It analyzes the balance between "propert y rules,liability rules,administrative rules or criminal responsibility" and proposes to build an incentive mechanism for the selection of "rational people".Standardize the re sponsibility of consumers and sellers and standardize the development of production en terprises,in order to use the theory of "legal incentive system",re-regulate the respon sibility of the subject of behavior,and adapt to the choice of "rational people",so as to get rid of "limitation" The conflicts of social habits and the increase of “seekers”;the fifth part is the conclusion,some remarks on the thesis.