A Study On The Legal Problems Of Public Cultural Service Guarantee

The Law of the People's Republic of China on Public Cultural Services Guarantee is an important,fundamental,comprehensive and comprehensive law in the field of culture.It can not only safeguard cultural rights,but also promote cultural construction and play a vital role in the construction of cultural rule of law.The article starts from the perspective of the rule of law on public culture and public cultural services,from the basic connotation of public culture to the interpretation of law,and based on this,explores the "Public Cultural Service Guarantee Law" from the perspective of institutional practice,from the legislative subject to the framework system.Sort it one by one.Then comprehensively evaluate the implementation of the Safeguards Law and explore the problems and deficiencies that still exist.Through the reference to relevant legal systems outside the domain,we will improve the public cultural service guarantee system in China.Firstly,exploring the public culture and public cultural services from the perspective of the rule of law is the basis of the article.The definition and characteristics of the public culture are analyzed.After confirming its connotation,it interprets and interprets the public culture in a constitutional interpretation,analyzes the protection and manifestation of cultural rights in the Constitution,and the relevant provisions on public cultural services in the departmental law.The Public Cultural Service Guarantee Act from the perspective of research system practice.From the legislative theme to the framework of the entire law,a rigorous analysis and analysis of the legislative main body must have a comprehensive grasp and in-depth analysis,with the main goal of value guidance and providing inclusive services,in the construction of facilities and management systems,public The three parts of cultural service provision and safeguard measures are systematically sorted out.The essence of law lies in its implementation.The goodness of implementation reflects the validity and authority of the law.Aiming at the implementation status of the local public service guarantee law since the promulgation of the Public Cultural Service Guarantee Law,through comprehensive investigation,through the investigation and study of the implementation status,and the sample analysis of the public cultural service demonstration area,the main problems in the current implementation are sorted out.It mainly includes insufficient publicity and training,and the institutionalization and standardization of grassroots public cultural facilities should be strengthened,and the effectiveness of service provision is insufficient.In view of the problems existing in the system and practice of public cultural services in China,we fully draw on the experience of extra-territorial,in order to play a role in learning and supplementing the construction of public cultural service system in China.The article mainly selects three different models of English,American and French for analysis,compares the British decentralized cultural management system,the American socially operational cultural management model and the French centralized cultural management model,and their respective The characteristics are analyzed,and the experience of different countries outside the domain is comprehensively analyzed and compared,focusing on the combination with the reality of China.Finally,on the improvement of relevant systems and suggestions,it puts forward countermeasures to expand democratic participation,improve the supply of cultural services,and strengthen the institutionalization of grassroots public cultural services.It is hoped that we will further improve our public cultural service system and enrich the spirit of citizens.Cultural life promotes cultural development and prosperity.