Media And Judicature From The Perspective Of Legal Value Theory

With the rapid development of the Internet,the media has penetrated into all areas of social life.At the same time,as an important part of the rule of law society,justice has received more and more attention.At the same time that the judicial issue has become the focus of the media,the relationship between the media and the judiciary has gradually attracted the attention of the academic circles,and has become one of the hot issues discussed by academic circles at home and abroad.This paper attempts to cut through the perspective of legal value,analyzes the subjective characteristics and value pursuit of the media and the judiciary,analyzes the innate conflicts between the media and the judiciary,and discusses the game between the media and the judiciary in combination with the different theories of western ideological history,trying to provide new ideas for alleviating the conflicts between the two.Specifically,this article is divided into four chapters to discuss the game between the media and the judiciary.The first chapter summarizes the research status at home and abroad.The second chapter expounds the basic theories such as the concept,function and basic principles of the media and the judiciary,and sorts out the "Yao Jiaxin Case" and "Yuhuan Case".The focus of the game between the media and the judiciary provides a theoretical basis for the game of legal value to be discussed later.From the third chapter,the core part of the paper is the analysis of the legal value of the game between the media and the judiciary.The third chapter analyzes the connotation of free and fair value and its related doctrines,provides legal basis for media freedom and judicial justice,and analyzes the causes of conflicts between the two,and then attempts to pass the extraterritorial experience of conflicts to China.Judicial practice provides a reference and puts forward its own opinions on this basis.The context of the fourth chapter is basically the same as that of the third chapter.The difference is that this chapter has no reference to extraterritorial experience,and more emphasis is placed on the benefit value.On the question of the choice of value conflicts with the value of order,we try to use this analysis to point out the primary and secondary problems in conflicts.