Study On The Relative Concentration Of Administrative Penalty In Urban Management

According to Article 16 of the Administrative Punishment Law,"The State Council or the people's governments of provinces,autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central Government authorized by the State Council may decide that an administrative organ shall exercise the power of administrative punishment of the relevant administrative organs,but the power of administrative punishment to restrict personal freedom can only be exercised by public security organs",and relatively centralize the power of administrative punishment.The system was piloted nationwide.Since 2000,urban administration bureaus have been established in most cities throughout the country.As a developed city in the Pearl River Delta,Foshan has formed its own set of practical methods in exploring the urban management system needed to adapt to the socialist market economy.The author takes Foshan City as the blueprint to carry out the work of relatively centralized power of punishment,and uses the methods of literature research,comparative analysis and field investigation to analyze the legal basis of the system of relatively centralized power of administrative punishment and the status quo of relatively centralized power of administrative punishment in Foshan City.This paper summarizes the causes of the problems in the implementation of the relatively centralized administrative penalty system in Foshan City,and draws on the management experience of advanced cities at home and abroad,and puts forward feasible countermeasures for the urban management departments to apply the relatively centralized administrative penalty system.