| Higher education,as an important support for China's medium and long-term national strategy,plays an important role in the future development of our country.However,due to the unfavorable social atmosphere in recent years,as well as the lag in the management style of higher education institutions due to the sharp increase in the enrollment of higher education institutions,,The construction of study style in colleges and universities in our country is facing an unprecedented bottleneck.Therefore,how to appraise the construction of study style in higher learning institutions in our country,clarify the level indicators,determine the measures for the development and construction in the latter period,and achieve the good development of the style of study in colleges and universities have become one of the major concerns of all walks of life.In view of the above problems and the actual development of SRU university style of study,we summarized related theories,analyzed existing research theories,built a comprehensive evaluation system for SRU university style of study,and used AHP analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation methods to collect data from survey questionnaires.Analysis,in-depth analysis of the overall performance of the SRU style of study and the status of indicators at all levels,to provide reference for SRU college related departments.The following three points are the conclusions drawn for this study:(1)Based on the actual situation of the SRU style of study,a comprehensive evaluation index system for the SRU style of study has been specifically proposed and constructed,covering 25 indicators in eight dimensions including three aspects of the security system,teachers' teaching style,and student learning style.(2)The AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)method was used to determine the weights of the comprehensive evaluation index system for SRU style of study.It was found that the maximum proportion of teachers' teaching style in the SRU style of study was 0.5298,in which the weights of teachers and teachers' work and results were 0.4902 and 0.5098;students' academic style accounted for 0.3405,ranking second,among which the ideological situation,learning situation,and social practice accounted for0.3479,0.3989,and 0.2532,respectively;and the security system's share of 0.1296 ranked third,including human protection,material security,and management.Theproportion of protection is 0.3821,0.2894 and 0.3285 respectively.(3)Using fuzzy comprehensive evaluation to measure the construction of SRU's academic style,the comprehensive score is 0.729,which is slightly better than the average.The second level indicator system,teacher's teaching style and internal competitiveness score are 0.816,0.710 and 0.724 respectively.The three major indicators of the rapid improvement and improvement are mainly the aspects of teaching quality,classroom management,guiding students in scientific research,in-class attendance,rising rates,average final exam scores,and student participation rates. |
PDF Full Text Request