Analysis On Stakeholders Tracing Of Athletes' Doping Cases After The Event

With the rapid development of the current economy,competitive sports are gradually showing a commercial development trend,and cases of doping violations in the sports field have occurred from time to time.The Armstrong case is a typical case of doping violations in the sports field.It has the characteristics of high social concern,large amount of capitals,wide coverage,and great influence in the professional field.Since 2012,it has been complained by different stakeholders.This case has caused the author to pay attention to the issue of post-accident investigation of China's doping violation cases.At this stage,China's anti-doping work is fruitful,but there are still some problems.For example,there are still gaps in the relevant path of stakeholder cases in the doping case.Therefore,it is necessary to learn from and draw on the advanced experience of the stakeholders in the Armstrong case afterwards,and provide valuable practical suggestions for the follow-up investigation of the stakeholders in China's doping cases.This paper mainly uses the literature research method,case analysis method,expert interview method,and logic analysis method to analyze the post-accident investigation process between the lawsuit champion Armstrong stimulant violation case and its stakeholders,and summarize the athlete stimulant violation.After the case,the case was investigated and the Chen Xiexia stimulant incident was taken as an example to discuss the current situation and existing problems of the doping cases in China.The focus of this paper is based on China's national conditions and stimulant violation cases after the investigation of the status quo,drawing on the path of the US effective stimulant cases after the event and making corresponding recommendations.The main conclusions of this paper are as follows:First,the way to investigate the stakeholders of doping cases of American athletes is relatively perfect.Through the post-accident investigation of the stakeholders in the Armstrong case,it is concluded that at the government level,the effective intervention of the judicial process protects and protects the relevant rights and interests of stakeholders;the anti-doping agency's promotion of the doping case makes the sports field better.Anti-doping environment.At the sponsor level,based on the sponsorship contract relationship,it has a post-accident basis and has a strong sense of legal investigation.At the media level,we will promote the resolution of disputes in doping cases,give full play to the role of media supervision,and effectively solve the problem of post-accident investigation of stakeholders in doping cases.These points can provide a certain reference for the post-accident investigation of the doping cases in China.Second,there are currently some athletes in China who have been decommissioned and have achieved excellent results.Chen Xiexia is a typical case of stimulant violations.It has a high degree of social attention,a wide range of sponsor ships,and a large amount of money.For this,there is no corresponding economic recovery of stakeholders,reflecting the interests of China's doping cases.The relevantparties will pursue the blank of the process afterwards.Thirdly,compared with the United States in the aftermath of the case of athletes' stimulant cases,at the government level,the law enforcement of athletes' doping cases is not perfect afterwards,and the stakeholders lack legal protection;there is no independent sports arbitration institution,and the case is afterwards.Dispute resolution is not professional;the results of the punitive drug violations are not clear and cannot be used as an exemplary role for other stakeholders.At the sponsor level,there is a lack of corresponding contractual relationship construction,and stakeholders have a lack of corresponding legal basis for post-acquisition investigations.At the media level,the focus is on the benefits brought by the case exposure,neglecting the subsequent development of the case afterwards,failing to fulfill the social supervision responsibilities,and the activist case is insufficient after the event.Based on this need,we must improve the investigation and construction of China's doping cases.Fourth,the paper puts forward some suggestions for the stakeholders of athletes' doping cases.Based on the athletes' own perspectives,they strictly follow the industry norms in the field,fulfill their own responsibilities within the competition,actively participate in anti-doping activities,and infiltrate the concept of ethical behavior into daily behavioral norms.Based on the perspective of stakeholders,the government departments perfected the post-accident investigation system for doping cases and played the leading role of the anti-doping center;the sponsors should establish contractual relationships and corresponding morally binding funds to raise awareness of post-accident investigation of doping cases;news media,fulfillment Social supervision responsibility,shaping a good after-the-fact environment,actively promoting the solution of disputes in doping cases,and other suggestions to solve the problems in the aftermath of the Chinese athletes' doping cases.