A Comparative Study Of The Mechanics Of High School Physics Textbooks Based On Curriculum Standards

In the 21 st century,countries around the world pay more attention to the development of science and technology and the accumulation of talent pool.The level of physics education is largely related to the country's scientific and technological level.The main carrier of physics education is textbooks.Textbooks play an important role in cultivating talent and disseminating cultural knowledge.Textbooks as carrier for curriculum standards,and changes in curriculum standards promote the preparation of new textbooks.In order to study the law of writing physics textbooks,this paper takes the curriculum standards as the criterion,the physics curriculum theory as the foundation,and focuses on the mechanics part.The following research is carried out on the development of the mechanics part of high school physics textbooks after the reform and opening:First of all,on the basis of discussing the development law of China's physics curriculum standards after the reform and opening up,it is found that the “curriculum standards ” is used to replace the “syllabus” in terms of name;in the content,the subject center is broken and the“partial,difficult,complicated and old” is changed.The development law of high school physics textbooks in China is manifested in the following: from the single compulsory mode to the evolution of compulsory and elective combination;in the study requirements,pay attention to the cultivation of students' learning and thinking ability;in the content,emphasize the basic knowledge,the deletion is too difficult knowledge;In presentation mode: optimize the layout design of textbooks.Comparing the relationship between physics curriculum standards and the development of high school physics textbooks,it can be seen that although textbooks must be written in accordance with the requirements of curriculum standards,there is still a certain degree of freedom in the preparation of textbooks;the use of textbooks can test the feasibility and scientificity of curriculum standards.Secondly,based on the curriculum standards and the development rules and links of textbooks,the thesis constructs a comparative analysis framework for textbooks,in the fourlatitudes of textbook content requirements,content selection,content organization and ways of presenting.the four latitudes of the current widely used People's Education Press,Shandong Science and Technology Press,Shanghai Science and Technology Education Press,Education Science,Press and Guangdong Education Publishing House were compared,founded that the People's Education Press is more logical;Shandong Science and Technology Press is more abundant;Shanghai Science has obvious characteristics;Technology Education Presshas higher readability.,it is also more connected with life;Guangdong Education Publishing House is more comprehensive.Through the questionnaire survey,the high school physics teachers' opinions on the use of the People's Education Press,Shandong Science and Technology Press are shown.The results show that the teachers surveyed have higher evaluations on the Shandong Science and Technology Press.In terms of the rigor and logic of the People's Education Press,the evaluation is even higher.In the future,the preparation of high school physics textbooks in China,in the content requirements of textbooks,aims to implement the core literacy of physics;in the selection of textbook content,based on the physics curriculum standards,build a knowledge framework around the core literacy of physics;in the content organization of textbooks pay attention to the level of content,play the function of each section,and provide support for students' learning;in the way of textbook presentation,the layout should be appropriate in size,color matching is reasonable,fonts and papers are designed in strict accordance with the standard.