Can Peasant Household Of Rural Backward Area Working Outside Improve Their Family Development?

In the past 40 years since the reform and opening up,the household income level and the family development status of rural households in China have greatly improved.However,due to various reasons,such as economic development level and historical and cultural differences,the imbalance of the development level of peasant households in different regions in the whole country still exists,and there is even an expanding trend.What needs to be noticed is that,due to the lagging development of local industries and the single employment path,rural poor peasant household are choosing to go out to work in order to improve their families' development.So,can the migrant work improve the family development status? For this important problem,the existing literature has not yet formed a unified conclusion: part of the literature research thinks,farmer migrant workers to bring the whole family the increase of non-agricultural income,thus improve family overall development;However,some literature studies have found that migrant workers can have a series of negative effects on agricultural production and endogenous development of peasant households,so they cannot improve the development of peasant households.As such,in the current "precise poverty alleviation" and "rural revitalization" countries such as the macro development strategy under the background,through on-the-spot investigation,thorough investigation peasant migrant workers can fundamentally improve family development in poor area,put forward the corresponding countermeasures and Suggestions,is particularly important.Under this guidance,the paper tries to answer the following questions through field research: what is the basic status of peasant households in rural poverty-stricken areas? What specific indicators can be used to measure the development of peasant households? Is going out to work is the optimal choice for improving the family development level of peasant households? Paper work in combed out effects on the development of farm households,on the basis of related research,adopting some county in guizhou province bijie city 9 township(town)36 village field sampling survey data of 1756,a thorough investigation of rural poor areas the basic situation of farm households,and from the village level to grasp the research systematically the basic situation.At the same time,it analyzes the basic information of migrant workers and the main factors that influence the development level of peasant household' families.According to the results of statistical description,select relevant measure to measure the development level of farm households,will measure the results as the dependent variable,a migrant factors as independent variables,using multivariate Logistic model,discusses improved job market development for the family.The main conclusions of the paper include:First of all,the overall description of the sample is found: from the perspective of individual and family population,the proportion of minority families going out to work is relatively small compared with that of the han families.There was a significant increase in the proportion of the isolation and self-monitoring in the absence of migrant workers.The total population of the family is 3 to 5,and the head of the household is mostly young.From the perspective of family economic situation,the first economic source of the family is mainly working,with the majority of middle and low income families.The average income per person is higher than that of working families.From the village level,the number of people working in the villages with small number of individual businesses,such as daily department stores and catering,is relatively large.At the same time,the per capita cultivated land area of the family,usually young people in the relatively old age to go out proportion large;In the survey area,agricultural cooperatives and small and micro enterprises are limited by capital and technology,and the production and operation are single;In addition,the research field teacher power has not reached the optimal allocation,the development of education has to be improved.Secondly,according to the statistical analysis of migrant families,the proportion of households headed out of the home is larger.The outside member culture level is generally not high,but most have more abundant work experience;There is a central tendency in the rural areas,but the training mechanism is not perfect.Workers' subjective feelings indicate that they are tired of working outside the home.They generally believe that it is more detrimental to their children's good character and habits than their academic performance.In constructing the multidimensional measure of family development model analysis found that: physical capital,financial capital and natural capital,social capital and psychological capital five indicators to comprehensively measure family development status of latitude;The results showed that families were better off than those who did not.Thirdly,using multivariate Logistic regression model analysis of migrant workers in poor rural areas the influence of the development status of farm households found that out when the staff of the influence of human capital status for the entire family significantly;The outside industry is the home development of the construction industry and the manufacturing industry is relatively good;Education and medical care are still "two big problems" in rural poor areas.Finally,based on the above results and analysis,this paper puts forward relevant countermeasures and Suggestions: strengthen the skills training of peasant household and carry out effective ideological guidance;We will improve the health care system and the education subsidy policy,and make full use of the supporting advantages of supporting education.Relying on the policy support and national characteristic advantages,the enterprise orientation helps to promote the rural endogenous development.