| At present,affected by various factors at home and abroad,the development of China’s private enterprises is experiencing a cold current.Many private enterprises suffer from lack of liquidity,and the debt crisis tends to erupt in a concentrated manner.In addition,it inevitably produces a chain reaction,forming risk transmission and spread to the social field.The purpose of this paper is to risk theory and governance theory as the theoretical framework,through case study,literature research methods,such as combination of private enterprise debt crisis production and the diffusion mechanism of social risk to Q group debt crisis and social risk management as a case,the current private enterprise debt crisis and social risk management for empirical research.Firstly,the connotation and extension of the social risk of the debt crisis of private enterprises are investigated by combining the theory of local risk,governance theory and related researches on the debt crisis of private enterprises.Next to qq group debt crisis social risk management as a case,the data collected about the development of the risk of further induce private enterprise debt crisis in labor disputes,business projects,borrowing contradictions in various fields such as performance,detailing the government,the judicial organs,banking institutions,enterprises measures taken by the four departments,the current debt crisis and social risk management in the management of private enterprises are analyzed.Thirdly,from the actual effect of response measures,this paper analyzes the problems in risk governance response strategies and system construction,as well as the deep-seated reasons such as rigid concept,communication failure and low efficiency.Finally,from the perspective of cooperative governance,this paper puts forward countermeasures and Suggestions on the transformation of philosophy,construction of system and function play of each governance body,and explores the establishment of a governance network with the government as the core and the public participation of judicial organs,financial institutions and enterprises,as well as the mechanism of risk sharing,trust,coordination and communication.Finally,it is concluded that the concept should be changed in the social risk management of the debt crisis of private enterprises,the government should strengthen the sense of responsibility,establish the rule of law,steer rather than paddle,serve rather than control,effectively build a risk management network,organize and coordinate different governance bodies to strengthen dialogue,and constantly optimize the governance mechanism.All governance bodies should actively assume their responsibilities,follow a unified direction,strengthen trust and communication,and better play their functions. |
