Poverty alleviation is the greatest grass-roots governance practice since China’s reform and opening up.It is also the largest anti-poverty national strategy in human history.At present China is facing the key moment of the battle for poverty alleviation,into the deep water period for poverty alleviation,must want to see the government administrative leading precision caused many grassroots governance issues in the sinking process of poverty alleviation policy,rural local knowledge production and state-led poverty alleviation movement exists rupture,causing poverty alleviation absorb the pattern of governance,not only affect the effect of poverty alleviation,also affects the grassroots governance structure.So it is necessary to combine local governance and poverty alleviation practice,with the village party branch as the gripper,perfect the rural poverty reduction in the process of governance,internal and external structure in various management resources for poverty alleviation and stimulate the independent participation,poverty population out of poverty and the enthusiasm of independent development,fully coordinating all kinds of participation in grassroots governance,form a pattern of big country inside and outside the linkage of governance.Firstly,this paper sorts out the basic concepts of poverty,poverty alleviation and poverty alleviation at home and abroad.Then,it absorbs the advanced theoretical achievements of poverty alleviation and governance at home and abroad,such as Community Driven Development,composite governance and cooperative governance,In practice,the analysis framework of governance structure with village collective as the core should be built.With villagers’ autonomy as the driving force and party branches as the guidance,the rural resources should be informally integrated and institutionalized.Secondly,in the context of the structural contradiction between the transformation of national basic governance and grass-roots governance,poverty alleviation practice of W is selected as a case to summarize the feasibility,organizational framework,practical experience and poverty alleviation advantages based on the governance structure framework,so as to present the real picture of poverty alleviation in Chinese village.Then,the problems in the governance structure of W are deeply explored to highlight the current structural difficulties encountered by rural poverty alleviation,such as elite capture,suspended governance,bureaucratic binding and rigid development.These problems proved rural poverty alleviation in along with the transformation of governance and the development of grassroots governance structural deviation,the cause of errors in the further analysis of the governance structure,found mainly comes from the internal governance structure and external governance structure,and from three aspects of internal and external governance structure of interaction,internal governance structure is mainly embodied in management ability,management resources,governance,involved in a serious deficiencies;The external governance structure is mainly reflected in the contradiction of rural politics and rural governance,the difficulty of private sector intervention and the weak social force.The internal and external governance structure interaction mainly reflects that the community governance capability lags behind the development of the external governance body,the governance resources lack of reasonable distribution between the internal and external structure body,and the internal and external governance body participation lacks platform.Finally,in the analysis framework of this article,on the basis of practical experience at home and abroad,try to from optimizing the internal governance structure,improve the rural countryside external governance structure and strengthen internal and external governance structure interaction so as to put forward feasible countermeasures of rural poverty alleviation.It’s beneficial for the battle of Chinese comprehensive win out of poverty,to realize rural revitalization,stability good theoretical support for the grassroots governance structure. |