Study On The Reform Of Collective Property Right Reform In The Xun Long He Village

The reform of rural collective property rights is an important task that must be faced in the realization of modernization in rural areas of China,and an important way to solve the problems of China's "three rural" issues.In order to promote local governments to actively explore the effective implementation of rural collective ownership,from 2014 to this year,the government issued the Central no.1 document for six consecutive years,all mentioning the relevant content of promoting rural collective property rights reform.The core of solving the problem of "agriculture,rural areas and farmers" is to solve the problem of property rights of rural collective assets;especially in recent years,although China's rural collective property rights reform has achieved certain achievements,its scope is limited to pilot areas and other rural areas.The ownership contradiction of collective asset property rights still exists and has not yet been resolved.After some rural areas have undergone rural collective property rights reform,rural collective assets have not been properly managed,and various problems have emerged in an endless stream.Therefore,all localities must unswervingly continue to deepen reform rural collective property rights.As China's economic development has entered a new normal,the reform of the rural collective property rights system has also entered the deep water area.Because of various reasons such as historical legacy,most rural areas in China have outstanding problems such as unclear ownership of rural collective assets,unclear powers and responsibilities,unsound protection,and unsmooth circulation.Therefore,in order to better protect the rights and interests of farmers,increase farmers'income and rural collective economic development,change the structure of rural agricultural industry,and reform the rural collective property rights system is inevitable.It was in this trend that the Xunlonghe village in 2014 was selected by the Hunan Province as a pilot demonstration area to carry out rural collective property rights reform.Since then,the village has been carrying out reforms of rural collective property rights.After the reform,the Xunlonghe village has undergone earth-shaking changes and has been rated as a "Xunlonghe" model by the government.Its reform experience is worth learning and learning from other places.This paper studies the process of rural collective property rights reform through the literature research method,case analysis method and field investigation method,combined with the economic development situation and institutional policy environment of Xunlonghe Village.Focusing on the specific measures taken by the village of Xunlonghe,it is studied whether these measures clarify the ownership of the collective assets of the village,whether the definition of the villager's identity is reasonable,whether it has played a positive role in the collective economy of the village,and whether it has increased the locality.Whether the income of the peasants,the reform has deviated from the government's goals,and so on.After further analysis and research,the author believes that after the rural collective property rights reform in Xunlonghe Village from the past 14 years,it has indeed increased the property income of the villagers,promoted the local rural economic development,and activated the internal development of local rural agriculture.Innovatively managed the operation mode of the village's collective assets.Although there are some minor problems in the reform process,from the current point of view,the reform of the collective property rights of the Xunlonghe Village is relatively successful.If we want to look at the long-term,we still need to look at the depth of the village's continued reform and implementation.Therefore,this paper suggests that the village should continue to deepen the reform of rural collective property rights,further quantify equity to individuals,establish a mature land transfer system,and implement management institutions.Separation of functions,improvement of supervision and management of collective assets and related laws and regulations,multi-faceted publicity,protection of farmers' rights and interests,etc.