| During the Ming and Qing dynasties,the immigration movement of “Jiangxi to Huguang”and the bureaucratization of native officers of the Tujia area in the west of Hunan and Hubei province had a great impact on the urban development of Yichang area.This paper in the basis of the research on the distribution of temples in the Ming and Qing Dynasty of the research group,discusses the distribution of buddhist and Taoist architecture and its status in landscape in different periods and ethnic areas,and finally concludes the changes of distribution and landscape status of Buddhism and Taoism buildings in Yichang during the Ming and Qing dynasties.This paper takes Donghu,Guizhou,Badong and Hefeng in Yichang in the Ming and Qing dynasties as the research objects.Firstly,it makes a detailed analysis of its construction history,geographical environment,economic society and population distribution,and then analyzes the historical background of the development of Yichang in Ming and qing dynasties,providing the foundation support for changes in the distribution and landscape status of Buddhist and Taoist architecture.Secondly,the spatial distribution and changing characteristics of buddhist architecture in the han nationality area are analyzed before and after the immigration movement and the bureaucratization of native officers.By comparing the spatial distribution characteristics of buddhist buildings in Donghu,Guizhou and Badong in different periods,it is found that the migration movement has affected the construction and distribution of Buddhist and Taoist buildings.However,the bureaucratization of native officers in the west of Hunan and Hubei province has affected the construction and distribution of Taoist architecture.In this process,the status of Buddhist and Taoist architecture in landscape also changed.During the immigration period,the status of Buddhist architecture landscape was higher than that of Taoist architecture,but lower than that of administrative,cultural and education,and official temples buildings.However,in the period of bureaucratization of native officers,the situation is just the opposite.The status of Taoist architecture landscape is lower than that of administrative,cultural and religious buildings,equal to that of official temples,and higher than that of buddhist buildings.Finally,the spatial distribution and changing characteristics of Buddhist and Taoist buildings in tujia area are analyzed during the bureaucratization of native officers.By comparing the spatial distribution characteristics of Buddhist and Taoist buildings in different periods and different settlement areas,it is found that the space of buddhist and Taoist buildings in Tusi period is controlled by Tusi,and the distribution of buddhist and Taoist buildings reflects its authority and legitimacy.After the bureaucratization of native officers,with the active involvement of civil forces in the construction of buddhist and Taoist buildings,the distribution of new buddhist and Taoist buildings is closely related to the population distribution.During this process,the landscape status of Taoist architecture changed.In Tusi period,Taoist architecture landscape was second only to administrative,and equal to cultural and religious buildings.But after the bureaucratization of native officers,The status of Taoist architectural landscape is weakened,and it is finally lower than that of administrative,cultural and official religious buildings,which is equal to the status of Buddhist architectural landscape.Through the extraction and study of Buddhist and Taoist architecture in Yichang prefecture during the Ming and Qing dynasties,this paper discusses the elements,levels and structures of the architectural system of different periods,ethnic groups and levels of settlements in Yichang,as well as the adjustment and cooperation with Buddhist and Taoist architectural elements.To investigate the changes of distribution and landscape status of Buddhist and Taoist architecture in social and economic life and political life,such as population migration and the bureaucratization of native officers.Finally,it provides a more detailed and reliable description of Chinese traditional construction landscape,provides reasonable background knowledge,forms a more appropriate and reasonable understanding of Chinese traditional landscape,and provides a knowledge framework for originality presenting protections. |