| Architectural heritage protection in recent years,more and more get more attention and take seriously,with the characteristics of architectural works to support the new urbanization,oppose "thousand city side",the study of historical building protection and reuse,is building the story of the hot topic of concern,at the same time through academic research,policies and regulations,with international vision and ideas,promote the architectural heritage conservation has important practical significance.But in recent years,with the development and construction of the city,the protection of historic buildings and historic blocks is often ignored.This paper takes Shenyang railway station,the most representative historical building in Shenyang,as the research object.Through a comparative study of the case with Tokyo railway station in Japan,this paper rises to a theoretical study to analyze the differences between China and Japan in the process of cultural heritage protection,and provides relevant references for the protection of urban landmark historical buildings in the future.Why Shenyang station and Tokyo station have similar historical background,but after a hundred years of renovation,they appear in two different spatial forms?In this paper,through on-the-spot investigation,mapping analysis,literature,from the historical evolution of two stations,analysis of the historical environment and reforming background,through to the two station monomer building space location,function,facade style,detail decoration,structure analysis and study of technology and landscape environment,looking for individual buildings protection and renovation of differences.From building blocks environment again at the same time,space,place,Zhongshan road historical block is analyzed and the Tokyo Marunouchi differences,in the process of conservation and renewal of historic blocks in the last from case study to the study of theory,comparison between China and Japan both in the protection principles and guidelines,the principle of "authenticity"land development rights transfer system,public participation system and the difference of architectural heritage protection system and the law,and sum up for heritage protection path with Chinese characteristics.Finally,through the comparative study of shenyang station and Tokyo station,the different protection principles and construction guidelines of the two stations are obtained.The difference between Chinese and Japanese laws and regulations on the protection of historical buildings;Shenyang station and Tokyo station have different positioning of"authenticity" in the process of heritage protection.The renewal and protection strategies of historic districts are different.These four points are the important conclusions of this paper.Through comparative study,the similarities and differences are analyzed,and theory is used to better solve practical problems.This study aimed to clarify based on the research of the two stations and reveal its during the process,participate in architectural heritage protection system and related laws and regulations,etc,specific,and rise to the related system measures the contrast between China and Japan,and for China in the city’s most iconic architectural heritage protection,historical building and historical block protection and renovation,and other fields to provide the corresponding reference and inspiration. |