| Based on a large number of real text corpora in the corpus,on the basis of modality theory,and guided by cognitive grammar,semantic functional grammar,subjectivity and subjectivization theories,etc.this paper analyzes the different types of reversal modal words from two planes,diachronic and synchronic.In-depth exploration of the modal semantics and pragmatic functions of subclasses.This paper focuses on selecting "Dao" and "Dao Shi" in the opposite and opposite categories;"Pian,Pian Pian" and "Pian Shi" in the affirmative and resolute category;and "Na Zhi Dao,Shui Zhi Dao" in the unexpected category for research.In addition to the introduction and conclusion,the full text consists of four chapters.The introduction part mainly introduces the significance of the topic selection and research content,research status and theoretical methods,the innovation of the paper and the source of the corpus.The first chapter mainly defines 65 modal words representing inversion in modern Chinese by combining typical semantic features [+ opposite] [+ turning point],semantic framework,dictionary interpretation and previous research,and classify them according to form,function and meaning.Specifically,it is divided into four major categories: opposite and opposite,affirmative and resolute,unexpected and unexpected,and other categories.Among them,the unexpected and unexpected category is further divided into two sub-categories: the result is contrary to the result and the result is not expected,and a brief overview is combined with the corpus.Characteristics of various modal words.The second chapter studies the situation and reasons why the opposite modal adverbs "Dao Shi" and "Dao" should not be used interchangeably from the perspective of semantic function grammar in terms of turning semantics,but in terms of deviating from the expected meaning,"Dao" can be partially contradicted with the synonym of "incomplete",but "Dao Shi" is not.In terms of pragmatic function,in terms of tone communication,“Dao Shi” has three kinds of tones,and also has a certain tone;in terms of focus function,“Dao” is mainly used as a focus marker,while “Dao Shi” is often used to highlight the contrasting focus.The semantic point is upward,and the semantic back-pointing tendency of "Dao" is stronger than that of "Dao Shi".Based on a large amount of real corpus,the third chapter systematically analyzes the situations and reasons why the affirmative and resolute modal adverbs "Pian,Pian Pian" and "Pian Shi" should not be used interchangeably,as well as their semantic and pragmatic functions."Pian Pian Shi" mainly refers to the intentional state that the subjective wishes and expectations are completely or partially contradicted,and "Pian Pian" often refers to the rebellious state that the objective facts and expectations are completely or partially contradicted.In terms of pragmatic function,in addition to the three common tones of "Pian,Pian Pian,and Pian Shi","Pian,Pian Shi" can also express a rebuttal tone,and "Pian Pian" can also express a helpless tone.In terms of subjectivity,the subjectivity of "Pian Pian" is stronger than that of "Pian and Pian Shi".The fourth chapter investigates the semantic origin,semantic function and pragmatic function of the unexpected modal word "Na Zhi Dao,Shui Zhi Dao" on the basis of large-scale real corpus.Stronger than "Na Zhi Dao",when expressing meaning,"Shui Zhi Dao" has a stronger semantic tendency.In terms of pragmatic function,the lower-than-expected information expressing ability of "Na Zhi Dao" is stronger than that of "Shui Zhi Dao",but in terms of cohesive function and discourse coherence,"Shui Zhi Dao" is stronger than "Na Zhi Dao".The conclusion part summarizes the full text and points out the possible shortcomings of this paper.The conclusion part summarizes the full text and points out the possible shortcomings of this paper. |
