Defend Marx In A Deconstructed Way

At the beginning of the new century,Western capitalist countries started a globalization movement centered on Western values.With the deepening of globalization,more and more crises have emerged.Although we have seen the development opportunities that globalization has brought to various countries,there are greater crises behind the opportunities.The purpose of the globalization movement launched by Western countries is to seek absolute discourse and priority in global politics,while also seeking global political hegemony.Western developed countries have also weakened the status and corresponding rights and interests of socialist countries in the process of economic integration.Therefore,in the 21 st century,socialist countries need to combine Marxism with their specific national conditions,and generate realistic transformative power to compete with capitalism and protect their own rights and interests.As the founder of deconstructionism,Jacques Derrida chose to align with Marx when Marxism was most in danger.Using deconstructionist philosophical discourse,he reaffirmed the validity of Marxism,and each of us is the heir to the legacy of Marxism..Derrida chose the most appropriate time to bravely defend the status of Marxism.Derrida provides us with a new perspective to understand Marxism and a new opportunity to rejuvenate Marxism.Therefore,this article focuses on Derrida's "The Ghost of Marx" as the starting point,and discusses the timing of Derrida's alliance with Marxism and how Derrida inherits Marxism in a deconstructive way to demonstrate that in the new century,Western capitalism has implemented global hegemony In the context of the times,Derrida's importance to the defense of Marxism.This article is divided into three partsThe first part begins with the success of the Russian revolution in the 20 th century,but it introduces the influence of Western Marxism on Derrida in the context of the failure of the Western world revolution.Second,it introduces Nietzsche's "God is dead" theory,Husserl's "other" theory,Heidegger's "destruction" and Saussure's structuralist linguistics,and the influence of Hegel's difference on Derrida Finally,it explains how Derrida became a master of deconstruction.The second part first introduced Derrida's "deconstruction" method to snatch Fukuyama's "historical final conclusion",and then on this basis,Derrida embarked on a journey to protect Marxism.Derrida first throws questions,using various philosophers of history as testimony,to explore whether history will end? Therefore,he criticized the theory of the end of history supported by Bourgeois headed by Fukuyama from the source of logic.Next,Derrida questioned Fukuyama's view of the double standards of historical countries,declaring that even if double standards were used to examine different countries,the so-called post-historical countries of Fukuyama did not reach the state of democracy that he propagated.Finally,Derrida pointed out that Western scholars hope to erase Marxism from history,and its essence is equivalent to calling for Marx to appear again.Every time it is mentioned,it is calling for the return of Marxism.In an age of disconnection,then Marx's critical spirit of capitalism will inevitably be respected.In this chaotic era,we urgently need true "justice" to come to earth,making Marx's Messianic promise of communist society even more than we expected.In the end,Derrida put forward what he called a "new international" with justice based on Marx's communist society.The third part is mainly the evaluation of Derrida's thoughts.Derrida defends Marx's specific process in a deconstructive way,and there may be some problems.First of all,although Derrida is justifying Marx by deconstruction,it is destined to deconstruct Marx's theory due to its own characteristics of deconstruction,and the extended nature has led to excessive expansion of the internal gaps in Marx's theory,which ultimately led The spectre of Marxism.In the process of inheriting Marxist theory according to the characteristics of deconstruction,Derrida distinguishes good Marxism from bad Marxism,thus eliminating the realistic function of Marxism,leaving only the emptiness of critical spirit.Use this critical spirit to fight against this disjointed era,and dream of establishing a "new international" of the tyrannical style.Although Derrida's Marxist view has many flaws,there are also places we can learn from.Derrida called for the value of the times inherited by Marx.Derrida 's interpretation of Marxism inspired us from another perspective to pay attention to the practical validity of Marxism in today 's era.At the same time,we have increased our confidence inadhering to the Marxist road,and in the context of globalization,we have increased the possibility of seeking new outlets.