Research On "moral Kidnapping" From The Perspective Of Marxist Ethics

"Moral kidnapping" is an ethical and moral issue that has appeared in social and public life in recent years and has received increasing attention from people.Forcibly asking others to donate,otherwise they will be personally attacked;in public life,they will be forced to give up their seats unconditionally,otherwise they will be severely imposed.Condemnation...All kinds of veritable "moral kidnapping" exist objectively in social and public life,and have become a hindrance to the construction of civic morality in the new era.At the same time,all other moral coercions of a nature are called "moral kidnapping." Refusing to assume the moral obligations of participants in public life,and rejecting necessary and reasonable moral criticisms also occur from time to time.This tendency is becoming an important reason for aggravating moral anomie and fostering moral indifference.Therefore.Exploring theoretically what is "moral kidnapping" and clarifying the criteria for judging the truth of "moral kidnapping" and "pseudo-moral kidnapping" is a brand new issue that theoretical workers must face squarely.From the perspective of Marxist ethics,this article starts from the analysis of moral events in public moral life,comprehensively uses literature analysis,case analysis and other research methods to analyze and diagnose various "moral kidnapping" arguments and their theoretical premises.Attempt to establish a theoretical analysis framework for distinguishing true "moral kidnapping" and "pseudo-moral kidnapping".It is proposed that not all moral heteronomy and moral coercion are "moral kidnapping",and all other moral coercive behaviors that are necessary in public life and other disciplines are overwhelmed.For "moral kidnapping",in fact,the ethical status and ethical value of moral heteronomy are completely abolished,which will lead to a decline in moral standards,restrict the improvement of social civilization,and promote moral indifference in social public life.Just as the coin has its pros and cons,after criticizing the "moral kidnapping" habitually using "moral kidnapping" as a "puzzle" to shirk moral obligations and its theoretical roots,the paper further analyzes the harm of true "moral kidnapping".This is because heterogeneous moral coercion has boundaries and limits.Completely ignoring the moral abilities of public life participants,completely disregarding the moral situation when public events occur,and blindly requiring public life participants to undertake a certain moral obligation that they do not need to undertake or are unable to undertake,it is entirely possible to constitute a "kidnapping" of moral obligation.It is also not conducive to the construction of civic morality in the new era.This article intends to discriminate "moral kidnapping" and to rectify the name of moral coercion with boundaries and limits.From a theoretical point of view,the presupposition of clarifying halal truth and "pseudo-moral kidnapping" can enrich and develop Marxist ethics,and provide theoretical support for opening up a path to morality that transcends "moral kidnapping" and moral indifference.From a practical point of view,it can provide standards for the moral judgment and moral choices of public life participants,promote the healthy development of moral rationality,awaken people's moral emotions,protect people's reasonable rights and interests,and avoid the appearance of moral indifference,thus effectively Correct the problem of moral anomie in social and public life,and earnestly promote the implementation of the "Outline for the Implementation of Citizen Moral Construction in the New Era."...