A Comparative Analysis Of The Techniques And Tactics Of The Women's Soft Tennis Team Competition Between China, Japan And South Korea

Soft tennis originated in Japan and was introduced into China in the 1980 s.The sport evolved from a leisure sport into a competitive event,and then the Asian Soft Tennis Federation and the World Soft Tennis Federation,because it formed an independent system of techniques and tactics,with unique equipment and rules.It is particularly important to analyze the techniques and tactics of the soft tennis under the background of being a sports power and the situation that China basically keeps the third place of the soft tennis in various competitions.At present,the development of soft tennis in China is relatively slow.After the related rules of soft tennis were improved,the team event became more prominent in the competition.This not only requires athletes to have excellent technical conditions,but also requires coaches and athletes to have a certain tactical thinking.Through the observation of the soft tennis match in the past three years,it is found that China is in a backward state compared with Japan and South Korea.Therefore,the purpose of this paper is to study the performance of the strong team and learn from the experience to promote the development of China's technical and tactical level.This research adopts literature data method,video observation method,expert interview method,data statistics method,comparative analysis method and so on,nearly three years China cup,soft tennis cup,soft tennis world championships,South Korea,China,Japan and South Korea against the two tactics as the research object,Combining the author's own competition experience to deeply analyze the differences in technical and tactical performance between our country and the strong teams of Japan and South Korea,and puts forward some suggestions on how to further develop the soft tennis competition level in our country.Through the research,the following conclusions are drawn:(1)Judging from the overall score and loss of China,Japan and South Korea,the forehand stroke scores of the players in the three countries accounted for the largest proportion of all the technical applications.In the team doubles,the Chinese team gave up more points on forehand drives than the Japanese and Korean teams.And the Japanese and Korean players in the forehand stroke technology scoring rate is significantly higher than the Chinese team;Chinese team singles forehand strokes lose less points than the percentage of points,while Japanese and Korean forehand strokes lose more points than the percentage of points.(2)In the return of serve,no matter in singles or doubles,the error rate of China team is higher than the scoring rate,while the average error rate of China team in second serve is very low;From the point of direct score,the direct score of China team is 0;The Japanese team scored more points in return than China,and the number of errors in return was much lower than China's.(3)In the statistics of the positions of doubles in China,Japan and Korea,the one-net and one-bottom positions belong to the core positions,while the double-net and double-baseline positions are less frequently used in the matches.Among them,the scoring rate of China team in one net and one bottom position is not much different from that of Japan and South Korea;But the losing score rate is lower than Japan and South Korea.In one net and one bottom position,the success rate of switching positions in lob China team was significantly higher than that of Japan and South Korea.It shows that in doubles matches,the advantage of China team is switching positions when in lob in one net and one bottom position.(4)The arrangement of the Chinese team in the team competition is relatively simple,the pairing of the doubles members is relatively fixed,and there is no flexible change of the order of the players.In the team competition,at least two or more pairs of players are required.For China,the pairing of players is fixed,while for Japan and South Korea,one player can play with two or more players.But China has not been able to achieve the same tactical benefits as Japan and Korea(1+1>2).