A Quantitative Comparative Study On The System Of Geography Activity Materials In Junior School Between China And Singapore

As an important part of the textbook,the activity system is often only a part of the qualitative structure analysis of the textbook comparison,lacking quantitative analysis;and the textbook activity system in compulsory education does not follow up in real time,which is not conducive to the implementation of front-line teachers.As a country in the Chinese cultural circle and Asian quality education,Singapore is of great significance to objectively compare the mainstream version of geography textbook activity system in Singapore,which can provide corresponding strategies for the evaluation and preparation of geography textbook activities in junior high schools.In order to further and intuitively analyze the differences of China and Singapore,the full text follows three key points: to discuss the weight and weight coefficient of breadth and depth,the systematic quantification and objective comparison,and to enrich and enrich the international geography textbook activity system.Using the literature research method and induction method,the evaluation index was determined based on the quantitative model of difficulty,and quantitatively compared the breadth,depth and difficulty of the human teaching version and the Hood version activity system from the macro,medium view and micro scale.Research shows:(1)The quantitative research based on difficulty quantitative model,build and improve the breadth and depth assignment index system,and combined with data statistics and AHP analysis,the weight coefficient and ideal value;(2)on the macro level,the Chinese teaching version is broad,less types of activity columns,too large or too small,leading to excessive difficulty or small activity system.On the Chinese view level,the level of openness and independent exploration of the human education version activity system is quite different from that of the Singapore Hood version.At the micro level,the breadth and depth of the two is not different,the main difference is the presentation,consistent with the text system,the whole,overall systematic,rigorous language,Singapore version is the opposite;(3)finally for the two versions of the quantitative conclusion optimization suggestions,global control,effective optimization guidance;clear thinking,enhance geographical thinking;micro,to control,implement the core literacy;to further provide the optimization of the activity system.