Font Size: a A A

A Comparative Study Of Qian Daxin, Wang Mingsheng And Zhao Yi Zheng’s Historiography Thoughts

Posted on:2023-03-27Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:C H GaoFull Text:PDF
GTID:2555306776456494Subject:Chinese history
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
During the qianjia period,there was an upsurge of textual research,and the academic atmosphere changed from the wind of criticizing the empty and empty shortcomings of Neo-Confucianism to the wind of seeking truth from facts,and a large number of textual research scholars emerged.In addition,emperor Qianlong attached great importance to historiography,and decreed the reprinting of 21 histories and the establishment of 24 biographical historical books from Shiji to Ming History as the "official history",which prompted a large number of scholars to change from studying classics to studying history,and set off the upsurge of studying official history.Among the numerous achievements of textual historiography,qian Daxin’s "22 History Of Different",Wang Mingsheng’s "17 History discussion",Zhao Yi’s "22 History Notes" are the most outstanding.Qian,wang,zhao is the backbone of the school,in his book,in addition to a large number of research results,also contains abundant thoughts of historical compilation,three people summarize critique the twenty-four history compiling,clarify the defects of all previous dynasties history compilation and error,reveal revered as the "official" problems in the history of compiling and disadvantages,puts forward the official compiling methods and principles,It represents the value recognition of the scholars in qianjia era to the compilation of history books.Their different thoughts on the compilation of official history reflect their knowledge and cognition of the compilation of historical books.In official revision and private revision,Qian Daxin and Zhao Yi both appreciated the historical works of one family,and complained about official revision,which showed their unique vision and knowledge,and reflected their dissatisfaction and frustration with historical library revision.In the aspect of straight brush and qubi,Qian Daxin points out the origin of historians’ qubi from the perspective of fact-seeking and advocates historians’ record straight writing.Wang and Zhao asked historians to write straight from the Angle of seeking truth,and not to distort "historical rights" and not to write straight.Qian and Wang had a deeper understanding of the spring-autumn and autumn brushwork,which fundamentally explained that the use of "spring-autumn brushwork" hindered the historical records from reflecting the truth of history.They suggested that the compilation of historical books should not neglect the importance of historical books for recording facts,and required historians to seek truth and truth.However,Zhao Yi himself praised the use of "spring and Autumn writing method",thinking that "spring and autumn writing method" also had its side based on facts and straight books,which could be used in compiling historical books,but he still stressed that straight books should be based on.Qian daxin also emphasized that historians should be flexible and not stick to rigid norms.Zhao Yi paid more attention to the innovation of historical norms,requiring that the norms should change at any time and not be stuck in the past,so as to ensure that historical events were clearly recorded.In the character limit,three different views,Zhao Yi more emphasis on the general change,specific situation specific analysis;Wang Mingsheng,on the other hand,pursues the norm too much and neglects the flexibility.Qian Daxin is to be cautious and flexible,do not adhere to the example of righteousness.On historical data mining Duo,has been advocated widely adopted by three people to choose falling,but in choosing the material carefully focus is different,take particular care qian da-xin inscription,the epitaph and genealogical information,national history,memoir,zhao wang is of critical concern category information,Wang Mingsheng also special emphasis on the novel and the value of the activity should be the dialectical view,requirement of mining can be beneficial.In terms of the complexity and conciseness of the content of historical books,the three men were deeply influenced by the idea of practical application of the classics and advocated that the historical books should contain more useful articles of the classics,and the contents such as the poems and chapters of literati should be simplified.Qian and Zhao also emphasized that if the historians could achieve abundant articles on this basis,it would be the best.In addition,Qian,Wang and Zhao also made a theoretical interpretation of historians’ knowledge and moral cultivation,believing that historians should have talent,learning,knowledge and morality,and that history cultivation and moral cultivation are equally important.Without good personal accomplishment,the quality of history compilation will also be affected.Qian,Wang and Zhao have their own characteristics in the compilation of official history.Qian Daxin’s compilation is more profound and knowledgeable,Zhao Yi is more versatile,and Wang Mingsheng is a little inferior to them.However,there are also some shortcomings in their thoughts.Generations of official compiling impossible from dynasty political intervention and independent development,these history books are not likely to be unaffected by the ruler’s reflect social reality,money,wang,zhao research in the process of the official text of official compiling has carried on the analysis of existing problems,advocate the historian history of keen insight,rigorous attitude,dare to documentary pursuit-of-truth spirit and flexible way of compiling,It has become an important treasure in the history of Chinese historiography.
Keywords/Search Tags:Qian Daxin, Wang Mingsheng, Zhao Yi, historiography, historian cultivation
PDF Full Text Request
Related items