Research On The Conflict Of Equity Solidification In The Reform Of Rural Collective Share Cooperative System

At the end of 2016,the State Council of the CPC Central Committee issued the opinions on steadily promoting the reform of the rural collective property rights system(hereinafter referred to as the opinions),and proposed to strive to basically complete the reform of the joint-stock cooperative system of rural collective operating assets nationwide in about five years.However,there are many difficulties in the implementation of the reform,among which the conflict of the choice of equity management reform mode is frequent,causing a series of contradictions.The reform of equity management is a key link in the reform of rural collective assets stock cooperative system.The state policy advocates that the equity management of rural collective assets should adopt a static management mode that does not adjust with the population change,and also emphasizes that how to reform should respect the wishes of villagers.However,it is found in the survey that the "one size fits all" approach adopted by local governments in the specific implementation process requires a static management mode,while a considerable proportion of villagers want to adopt a dynamic equity management mode,that is,adjust the equity distribution with the population change.The instrumental rationality of pursuing clear property right utility ignores the social impact and gradual process of property right definition,which leads to a lot of conflicts and contradictions.Based on the survey of Fuzhou,Zhangzhou,Quanzhou and other pilot areas of rural collective property rights system reform,this paper discusses the conflict between the solidified policy of equity management of collective assets and the wishes of villagers from the perspective of the gap between policy and practice,with the help of independent governance theory,informal system theory,embeddedness theory and social conflict theory.First,Policy analysis on the reform of equity management of rural collective assets stock cooperative system.There are two practical modes of equity management: static management and dynamic management.The central government advocates the reform mode of static management of stock right Solidification Based on the policy objectives of realizing clear property right,promoting property right circulation and equal exchange of urban and rural resource elements.In order to improve the efficiency of reform and avoid the cost of secondary reform,the local government fulfilled the tasks assigned by the central government on schedule,and required the village community to adopt the static management mode to solidify the equity,which caused resistance of some villagers,aroused conflicts and conflicts of the village community,delayed the reform process,damaged the efficiency of reform implementation and increased the transaction cost.Second,An analysis of villagers’ willingness to choose the mode of equity management.This paper investigates the willingness of villagers to choose the equity management mode in 10 villages through questionnaire survey,and 61.78% of the villagers choose the dynamic management mode.Based on the survey data and interviews with villagers,this paper analyzes the factors that affect the villagers’ choice of will by using binary logit regression,and finds that what affects the villagers’ choice of will is their pursuit of maximizing interests as rational economic people,as well as the influence of institutional knowledge and clan culture.Third,An analysis of the conflict between villagers’ will and the reform policy of equity management.The conflict between them is mainly reflected in the conflict between informal system and formal system,the conflict between policy objectives and individual interests,and the conflict between reform efficiency and village community equity.Fourth,Policy recommendations.On the basis of not using the compulsory way,we should give the reform time flexibility and respect the flexible policy of villagers’ autonomy.The corresponding suggestions are put forward as follows: carrying out the reform of equity management step by step,responding to the demands of diversified rights and interests;encouraging the autonomous governance of the village community,respecting the system formed by the self-determination of the villagers;carrying out the formal system of "integrity" and the informal system of "reasonableness".